You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 266 No. 14, October 9, 1991 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Original Contributions
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Patient-Controlled Analgesia

Does a Concurrent Opioid Infusion Improve Pain Management After Surgery?

Robert K. Parker, DO; Barbel Holtmann, MD; Paul F. White, PhD, MD, FFARCS

JAMA. 1991;266(14):1947-1952.


Abstract

Objective.
—To assess the influence of a continuous (basal) morphine infusion as part of a patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) system on the postoperative analgesic requirement and on recovery parameters following abdominal hysterectomy.

Design.
—Single-center, randomized, controlled protocol.

Setting.
—University medical center.

Participants.
—A total of 230 adult women were randomly assigned to receive no morphine infusion (control group) or a continuous 0.5-, 1.0-, or 2.0-mg/h morphine infusion. Each patient was able to self-administer supplemental intravenous bolus doses of morphine (1 to 2 mg) using a PCA infuser.

Main Outcome Measures.
—Use of the PCA device, opioid-related side effects, recovery times, and the patients' assessment of pain and sedation on linear visual analog scales were recorded during the 72-hour study period. Follow-up questionnaires were completed by the patients and their health care professionals to assess the overall adequacy of PCA therapy.

Results.
—Patients who received the 2-mg/h morphine infusions received significantly more opioid medication 9 to 72 hours after their operation than those who received no infusion (control group). The presence of a continuous morphine infusion of 0.5 to 2 mg/h did not significantly decrease the number of patient demands or supplemental bolus doses administered compared with the control group. Overall, 168 (84%) of the 199 patients who completed the 72-hour study were able to achieve adequate analgesia without requiring changes in the PCA regimen or experiencing major side effects. Recovery times and outcome variables were similar in all four groups.

Conclusion.
—The routine use of a continuous opioid infusion in combination with a standard PCA regimen does not improve pain management compared with PCA alone after abdominal hysterectomy.

(JAMA. 1991;266:1947-1952)



Author Affiliations

From the Department of Anesthesiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo.


Footnotes

Presented in part at the annual meeting of the American Society of Anesthesiologists, New Orleans, La, October 14-18,1989.

Reprint requests to Department of Anesthesiology, Washington University School of Medicine, Box 8054, 660 S Euclid Ave, St Louis, MO 63110 (Dr White).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Patient-Controlled Analgesia: Proxy-Controlled Analgesia?
Krane
Anesth. Analg. 2008;107:15-17.
FULL TEXT  

The Role of the Anesthesiologist in Fast-Track Surgery: From Multimodal Analgesia to Perioperative Medical Care
White et al.
Anesth. Analg. 2007;104:1380-1396.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Transdermal patient-controlled analgesia
Viscusi and Schechter
Am J Health Syst Pharm 2007;64:25-26.
FULL TEXT  

Patient-controlled analgesia: Finding a balance between cost and comfort
Viscusi and Schechter
Am J Health Syst Pharm 2006;63:S3-S13.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Patient-Controlled Analgesia
Grass
Anesth. Analg. 2005;101:S44-61.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Post-Cesarean Delivery Analgesia
Gadsden et al.
Anesth. Analg. 2005;101:S62-69.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Effects of acetaminophen on morphine side-effects and consumption after major surgery: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Remy et al.
Br J Anaesth 2005;94:505-513.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Effects of a Small-Dose Naloxone Infusion on Opioid-Induced Side Effects and Analgesia in Children and Adolescents Treated with Intravenous Patient-Controlled Analgesia: A Double-Blind, Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Study
Maxwell et al.
Anesth. Analg. 2005;100:953-958.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Magnitude of Acute Tolerance to Morphine Analgesia: Concentration-Dependent or Time-Dependent?
Ho et al.
Anesth. Analg. 2002;95:948-951.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Safety and Efficacy of Parent-/Nurse-Controlled Analgesia in Patients Less than Six Years of Age
Monitto et al.
Anesth. Analg. 2000;91:573-579.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Postoperative Pain Management
Hopf and Weitz
Arch Surg 1994;129:128-132.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1991 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.