You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 275 No. 5, February 7, 1996 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Special Communication
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Evaluating New Vaccines for Developing Countries

Efficacy or Effectiveness?

John Clemens, MD; Ruth Brenner, MD, MPH; Malla Rao, MEngg; Nebiat Tafari, MD; Charles Lowe, MD

JAMA. 1996;275(5):390-397.


Abstract

Despite the profusion of promising new vaccines against illnesses prevalent in developing countries, uncertainties about the balance between costs and benefits of new vaccines have retarded their use in public health practice. Conventional prelicensure trials of vaccine protection exacerbate these uncertainties by focusing on measurement of vaccine efficacy—the performance of a vaccine under idealized conditions. Vaccine effectiveness trials provide a more pragmatic perspective by addressing the performance of a vaccine under the ordinary conditions of a public health program, by capturing direct as well as indirect effects of vaccination, and by comprehensively addressing outcomes of public health concern. The use of effectiveness trials should enable more rational triaging of new vaccines for developing countries and may accelerate the introduction of new vaccines into public health practice by resolving speculative debates about practical costs and benefits.

(JAMA. 1996;275:390-397)



Author Affiliations

From the Division of Epidemiology, Statistics, and Prevention Research (Drs Clemens, Brenner, and Tafari and Mr Rao) and Office of the Director (Dr Lowe), National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Bethesda, Md.


Footnotes

This article is one of a series addressing emerging and reemerging global microbial threats.

Reprint requests to Epidemiology Branch, National Institutes of Health/NICHD, Bldg 6100, Room 7B03, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Dr Clemens).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Matched Case-Control Study of Effectiveness of Live, Attenuated S79 Mumps Virus Vaccine against Clinical Mumps
Fu et al.
CVI 2008;15:1425-1428.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Effectiveness of Mass Oral Cholera Vaccination in Beira, Mozambique
Lucas et al.
NEJM 2005;352:757-767.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Endpoints in vaccine trials
Hudgens et al.
Stat Methods Med Res 2004;13:89-114.
ABSTRACT  

Confounding by indication in non-experimental evaluation of vaccine effectiveness: the example of prevention of influenza complications
Hak et al.
J. Epidemiol. Community Health 2002;56:951-955.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Evaluation of Rotavirus Vaccine Effectiveness in a Pediatric Group Practice
Perez Mato et al.
Am J Epidemiol 2002;156:1049-1055.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Respiratory Syncytial Virus Immune Globulin Intravenous: Indications for Use
Committee on Infectious Diseases and Committee on Fetus and Newborn
Pediatrics 1997;99:645-650.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1996 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.