Use of lumbar radiographs for the early diagnosis of low back pain. Proposed guidelines would increase utilization

M. E. Suarez-Almazor, E. Belseck, A. S. Russell and J. V. Mackel
Public Health Sciences Department, Healthcare Quality and Outcomes Research Centre, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. Maria.Suarez-Almazor@ualberta.ca

OBJECTIVE: The Agency for Health Care Policy and Research (AHCPR) has recently published guidelines for the management of patients with acute low back pain, which include recommendations for the use of lumbar radiographs, based on the identification of "red flags" for fractures, tumors, or infections. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the potential impact of these guidelines in patients with new episodes of low back pain seen in primary care settings. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Four family clinics (18 physicians) in Edmonton, Alberta. PATIENTS: The records of all patients seen in 1992 and 1993 with a new episode of low back pain were reviewed: 963 patients had a history of back pain of less than 3 months. OUTCOME MEASURES: Lumbar radiograph utilization at the initial low back pain visit. Charts were also reviewed to determine subsequent occurrence of spinal tumors, infection, or fractures that could be related to low back pain. RESULTS: One hundred twenty-seven (13%) of the 963 patients with acute low back pain had lumbar radiographs during their first visit, 68 (54%) with oblique views. If the AHCPR guidelines had been applied to this population, 426 (44%) of the patients would have undergone radiography, increasing current utilization by 238%. Eight of the 963 patients had a diagnosis of fracture or bone tumor during follow-up. The sensitivity of the guidelines to potentially detect these diseases was higher than the physicians' utilization patterns, but their specificity and positive predictive values were low. CONCLUSIONS: The implementation of the AHCPR guidelines for the initial use of radiographs in patients with low back pain may increase utilization and economic costs. A more restricted and cost-efficient set of guidelines should be proposed.

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Diagnosis and Treatment of Low Back Pain: A Joint Clinical Practice Guideline from the American College of Physicians and the American Pain Society
Chou et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2007;147:478-491.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Diagnostic Evaluation of LBP: Reaching a Specific Diagnosis Is Often Impossible
Deyo
Arch Intern Med 2002;162:1444-1447.
FULL TEXT  

Evidence-Based Guidelines: Application to Clinical Practice
Scalzitti
ptjournal 2001;81:1622-1628.
FULL TEXT  

Low Back Pain
Deyo and Weinstein
NEJM 2001;344:363-370.
FULL TEXT  

Patients' Role in the Use of Radiology Testing for Common Office Practice Complaints
Wilson et al.
Arch Intern Med 2001;161:256-263.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A Survey of Primary Care Physician Practice Patterns and Adherence to Acute Low Back Problem Guidelines
Di Iorio et al.
Arch Fam Med 2000;9:1015-1021.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A Guideline Implementation System Using Handheld Computers for Office Management of Asthma: Effects on Adherence and Patient Outcomes
Shiffman et al.
Pediatrics 2000;105:767-773.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The art versus the science of medicine. Are clinical practice guidelines the answer?
SUAREZ-ALMAZOR and RUSSELL
Ann Rheum Dis 1998;57:67-69.
FULL TEXT