You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 279 No. 22, June 10, 1998 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Original Contribution
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (48)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Lumbar Supports and Education for the Prevention of Low Back Pain in Industry

A Randomized Controlled Trial

Mireille N. M. van Poppel, MSc; Bart W. Koes, PhD; Trudy van der Ploeg, MD; Tjabe Smid, PhD; Lex M. Bouter, PhD

JAMA. 1998;279:1789-1794.

Context.— Low back pain is a frequent and costly health problem. Prevention of low back pain is important both for the individual patient and from an economic perspective.

Objective.— To assess the efficacy of lumbar supports and education in the prevention of low back pain in industry.

Design.— A randomized controlled trial with a factorial design.

Setting.— The cargo department of an airline company in the Netherlands.

Participants.— A total of 312 workers were randomized, of whom 282 were available for the 6-month follow-up.

Interventions.— Subjects were randomly assigned to 4 groups: (1) education (lifting instructions) and lumbar support, (2) education, (3) lumbar support, and (4) no intervention. Education consisted of 3 group sessions on lifting techniques with a total duration of 5 hours. Lumbar supports were recommended to be used during working hours for 6 months.

Main Outcome Measures.— Low back pain incidence and sick leave because of back pain during the 6-month intervention period.

Results.— Compliance with wearing the lumbar support at least half the time was 43%. In the 282 subjects for whom data were available, no statistically significant differences in back pain incidence (48 [36%] of 134 with lumbar support vs 51 [34%] of 148 without, P=.81) or in sick leave because of low back pain (mean, 0.4 days per month with lumbar support vs 0.4 days without, P=.52) were found among the intervention groups. In a subgroup of subjects with low back pain at baseline, lumbar supports reduced the number of days with low back pain per month (median, 1.2 vs 6.5 days per month; P=.03).

Conclusions.— Overall, lumbar supports or education did not lead to a reduction in low back pain incidence or sick leave. The results of the subgroup analysis need to be confirmed by future research. Based on our results, the use of education or lumbar supports cannot be recommended in the prevention of low back pain in industry.


From the Institute for Research in Extramural Medicine (Ms van Poppel and Drs Koes, Smid, and Bouter) and the Faculty of Movement Sciences (Dr Smid), Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; and the Department of Health, Safety, and Environment, KLM Royal Dutch Airlines, Schiphol Airport, the Netherlands (Drs van der Ploeg and Smid).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Lumbar Supports to Prevent Recurrent Low Back Pain among Home Care Workers: A Randomized Trial
Roelofs et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2007;147:685-692.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Nonsurgical Management of Acute and Chronic Low Back Pain
Shen et al.
J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2006;14:477-487.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Relative Effectiveness of Worker Safety and Health Training Methods
Burke et al.
AJPH 2006;96:315-324.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Nonpharmacologic Management of Pain
Nadler
JAOA: Journal of the American Osteopathic Association 2004;104:6S-12S.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Use of back belts to prevent occupational low-back pain
CMAJ 2003;169:213-214.
FULL TEXT  

Reliability of the PEDro Scale for Rating Quality of Randomized Controlled Trials
Maher et al.
ptjournal 2003;83:713-721.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Low Back Pain
Deyo and Weinstein
NEJM 2001;344:363-370.
FULL TEXT  

A Prospective Study of Back Belts for Prevention of Back Pain and Injury
Wassell et al.
JAMA 2000;284:2727-2732.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Back Belts in the Workplace
Hadler and Carey
JAMA 2000;284:2780-2781.
FULL TEXT  

Update in Rheumatology
Wernick and Campbell
ANN INTERN MED 2000;132:125-133.
FULL TEXT  

Preventing Low Back Pain in Industry
Kraus et al.
JAMA 1998;280:1993-1994.
FULL TEXT  

Lumbar Supports Fail to Prevent Low Back Pain
Journal Watch Dermatology 1998;1998:14-14.
FULL TEXT  

Lumbar Supports Fail to Prevent Low Back Pain
JWatch General 1998;1998:4-4.
FULL TEXT  

Lumbar Supports for Prevention of Low Back Pain in the Workplace
Dillingham
JAMA 1998;279:1826-1828.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1998 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.