You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 283 No. 1, January 5, 2000 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Toward Optimal Laboratory Use
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (292)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related letters
 •Related articles
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Oncology
 •Cervical Cancer
 •Dermatology
 •Dermatologic Disorders
 •Pathology & Laboratory Medicine
 •Papillomavirus, Human
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

HPV DNA Testing in Cervical Cancer Screening

Results From Women in a High-Risk Province of Costa Rica

Mark Schiffman, MD, MPH; Rolando Herrero, MD; Allan Hildesheim, PhD; Mark E. Sherman, MD; Maria Bratti, MD; Sholom Wacholder, PhD; Mario Alfaro, MD; Martha Hutchinson, MD; Jorge Morales, MD; Mitchell D. Greenberg, MD; Attila T. Lorincz, PhD

JAMA. 2000;283:87-93.

Context  Human papillomaviruses (HPVs) are known to cause most cervical cancer worldwide, but the utility of HPV DNA testing in cervical cancer prevention has not been determined.

Objective  To provide comprehensive data on the screening performance of HPV testing for the most common carcinogenic types, at different levels of analytic sensitivity.

Design  Laboratory analysis conducted during 1993-1995, using 3 cytologic techniques and cervicography, followed by colposcopic examination of women with any abnormal cervical finding, to detect all high-grade intraepithelial lesions and cancer (reference standard of clinically significant disease). The HPV testing was performed subsequently with masking regarding clinical findings.

Setting  Guanacaste Province, Costa Rica, a region with a high age-adjusted incidence of cervical cancer.

Participants  Of 11,742 randomly selected women, 8554 nonpregnant, sexually active women without hysterectomies underwent initial HPV DNA testing using the original Hybrid Capture Tube test; a stratified subsample of 1119 specimens was retested using the more analytically sensitive second generation assay, the Hybrid Capture II test.

Main Outcome Measures  Receiver operating characteristic analysis of detection of cervical high-grade intraepithelial lesions and cancer by HPV DNA testing based on different cut points of positivity.

Results  An analytic sensitivity of 1.0 pg/mL using the second generation assay would have permitted detection of 88.4% of 138 high-grade lesions and cancers (all 12 cancers were HPV-positive), with colposcopic referral of 12.3% of women. Papanicolaou testing using atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance as a cut point for referral resulted in 77.7% sensitivity and 94.2% specificity, with 6.9% referred. Specificity of the second generation assay for positivity for high-grade lesions and cancer was 89.0%, with 33.8% of remaining HPV DNA–positive subjects having low-grade or equivocal microscopically evident lesions. The higher detection threshold of 10 pg/mL used with the original assay had a sensitivity of 74.8% and a specificity of 93.4%. Lower levels of detection with the second generation assay (<1 pg/mL) proved clinically nonspecific without gains in diagnostic sensitivity.

Conclusions  In this study population, a cut point of 1.0 pg/mL using the second generation assay permitted sensitive detection of cervical high-grade lesions and cancer, yielding an apparently optimal trade-off between high sensitivity and reasonable specificity for this test. The test will perform best in settings in which sensitive detection of high-grade lesions and cancer is paramount. Because HPV prevalence varies by population, HPV testing positive predictive value for detection of high-grade lesions and cancer will vary accordingly, with implications for utility relative to other cervical cancer screening methods.


Author Affiliations: Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Md (Drs Schiffman, Hildesheim, and Wacholder); International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France (Dr Herrero); Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Md (Dr Sherman); Costa Rican Social Security Administration, San Jose, Costa Rica (Drs Bratti, Alfaro, and Morales); Womens' and Infants' Hospital, Providence, RI (Dr Hutchinson); Omnia, Blue Bell, Pa (Dr Greenberg); and Digene Corp, Silver Spring, Md (Dr Lorincz).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED LETTERS

Human Papillomavirus Testing as a Screening Tool for Cervical Cancer
Leopold G. Koss, Mark Schiffman, Allan Hildesheim, Rolando Herrero, and Conchita Bratti
JAMA. 2000;283(19):2525-2526.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Benefits and Costs of Using HPV Testing to Screen for Cervical Cancer
Jeanne S. Mandelblatt, William F. Lawrence, Sharita Mizell Womack, Denise Jacobson, Bin Yi, Yi-ting Hwang, Karen Gold, James Barter, and Keerti Shah
JAMA. 2002;287(18):2372-2381.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

RELATED ARTICLES

Human Papillomavirus Testing for Primary Cervical Cancer Screening
Jack Cuzick
JAMA. 2000;283(1):108-109.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

January 5, 2000
JAMA. 2000;283(1):137-138.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

HPV DNA Testing of Self-collected Vaginal Samples Compared With Cytologic Screening to Detect Cervical Cancer
Thomas C. Wright, Jr, Lynette Denny, Louise Kuhn, Amy Pollack, and Attila Lorincz
JAMA. 2000;283(1):81-86.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Evaluation of an ELISA for p16INK4a as a Screening Test for Cervical Cancer
Balasubramanian et al.
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 2009;18:3008-3017.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Evaluation of a Prototype Real-Time PCR Assay for Carcinogenic Human Papillomavirus (HPV) Detection and Simultaneous HPV Genotype 16 (HPV16) and HPV18 Genotyping
Castle et al.
J. Clin. Microbiol. 2009;47:3344-3347.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Common Genetic Variation in TP53 and Risk of Human Papillomavirus Persistence and Progression to CIN3/Cancer Revisited
Koshiol et al.
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 2009;18:1631-1637.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Anal cancer prevention: how we are failing men who have sex with men
Cranston
Sex. Transm. Infect. 2008;84:417-419.
FULL TEXT  

Validation of an Automated Detection Platform for Use with the Roche Linear Array Human Papillomavirus Genotyping Test
Stevens et al.
J. Clin. Microbiol. 2008;46:3813-3816.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Comparison of Two PCR-Based Human Papillomavirus Genotyping Methods
Castle et al.
J. Clin. Microbiol. 2008;46:3437-3445.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Human Papillomavirus Genotype Specificity of Hybrid Capture 2
Castle et al.
J. Clin. Microbiol. 2008;46:2595-2604.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Prevalence and risk factors for carcinogenic human papillomavirus infections in rural Rakai, Uganda
Safaeian et al.
Sex. Transm. Infect. 2008;84:306-311.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Invited Commentary: Is Monitoring of Human Papillomavirus Infection for Viral Persistence Ready for Use in Cervical Cancer Screening?
Castle
Am J Epidemiol 2008;168:138-144.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A Comparison of Linear Array and Hybrid Capture 2 for Detection of Carcinogenic Human Papillomavirus and Cervical Precancer in ASCUS-LSIL Triage Study
Gravitt et al.
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 2008;17:1248-1254.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Results at Recruitment From a Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Human Papillomavirus Testing Alone With Conventional Cytology as the Primary Cervical Cancer Screening Test
Ronco et al.
JNCI J Natl Cancer Inst 2008;100:492-501.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Human Papillomavirus in Cervical Cancer Screening: Important Role as Biomarker
Boulet et al.
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 2008;17:810-817.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Comparison of Linear Array and Line Blot Assay for Detection of Human Papillomavirus and Diagnosis of Cervical Precancer and Cancer in the Atypical Squamous Cell of Undetermined Significance and Low-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion Triage Study
Castle et al.
J. Clin. Microbiol. 2008;46:109-117.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Detection of High-Risk Papillomavirus DNA with Commercial Invader-Technology-Based Analyte-Specific Reagents following Automated Extraction of DNA from Cervical Brushings in ThinPrep Media
Schutzbank et al.
J. Clin. Microbiol. 2007;45:4067-4069.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Human Papillomavirus DNA versus Papanicolaou Screening Tests for Cervical Cancer
Mayrand et al.
NEJM 2007;357:1579-1588.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Agreement between Self- and Clinician-Collected Specimen Results for Detection and Typing of High-Risk Human Papillomavirus in Specimens from Women in Gugulethu, South Africa
Jones et al.
J. Clin. Microbiol. 2007;45:1679-1683.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Comparison of the SPF10-LiPA System to the Hybrid Capture 2 Assay for Detection of Carcinogenic Human Papillomavirus Genotypes among 5,683 Young Women in Guanacaste, Costa Rica
Safaeian et al.
J. Clin. Microbiol. 2007;45:1447-1454.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Mouthwash as a Low-Cost and Safe Specimen Transport Medium for Human Papillomavirus DNA Testing of Cervicovaginal Specimens
Castle et al.
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 2007;16:840-843.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Simultaneous Amplification and Identification of 25 Human Papillomavirus Types with Templex Technology
Han et al.
J. Clin. Microbiol. 2006;44:4157-4162.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Relationships of human papillomavirus type, qualitative viral load, and age with cytologic abnormality.
Kovacic et al.
Cancer Res. 2006;66:10112-10119.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Dynamic behavioural interpretation of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia with molecular biomarkers
Baak et al.
J. Clin. Pathol. 2006;59:1017-1028.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Human papillomavirus testing and liquid-based cytology: results at recruitment from the new technologies for cervical cancer randomized controlled trial.
Ronco et al.
JNCI J Natl Cancer Inst 2006;98:765-774.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Development of a sensitive and specific assay combining multiplex PCR and DNA microarray primer extension to detect high-risk mucosal human papillomavirus types.
Gheit et al.
J. Clin. Microbiol. 2006;44:2025-2031.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Detection of carcinogenic human papillomavirus in specimens collected with a novel self-sampling device.
Castle et al.
J. Clin. Microbiol. 2006;44:2158-2159.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Systems Analysis of Real-World Obstacles to Successful Cervical Cancer Prevention in Developing Countries
Suba et al.
AJPH 2006;96:480-487.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Human Papillomavirus Triage of Atypical Squamous Cells of Undetermined Significance: Cost-Effective, But At What Cost?
Melnikow and Birch
JNCI J Natl Cancer Inst 2006;98:82-83.
FULL TEXT  

Human Papillomavirus Type 16 Infections and 2-Year Absolute Risk of Cervical Precancer in Women With Equivocal or Mild Cytologic Abnormalities
Castle et al.
JNCI J Natl Cancer Inst 2005;97:1066-1071.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Elevated 10-Year Risk of Cervical Precancer and Cancer in Women With Human Papillomavirus (HPV) Type 16 or 18 and the Possible Utility of Type-Specific HPV Testing in Clinical Practice
Khan et al.
JNCI J Natl Cancer Inst 2005;97:1072-1079.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

RESPONSE: Re: A Study of the Impact of Adding HPV Types to Cervical Cancer Screening and Triage Tests
Schiffman et al.
JNCI J Natl Cancer Inst 2005;97:939-941.
FULL TEXT  

Smoking Is a Risk Factor for Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Grade 3 among Oncogenic Human Papillomavirus DNA-Positive Women with Equivocal or Mildly Abnormal Cytology
McIntyre-Seltman et al.
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 2005;14:1165-1170.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Semiquantitative Human Papillomavirus Type 16 Viral Load and the Prospective Risk of Cervical Precancer and Cancer
Castle et al.
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 2005;14:1311-1314.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Comparison of Human Papillomavirus Messenger RNA and DNA Detection: A Cross-sectional Study of 4,136 Women >30 Years of Age with a 2-Year Follow-up of High-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion
Molden et al.
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 2005;14:367-372.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Facile, Comprehensive, High-Throughput Genotyping of Human Genital Papillomaviruses Using Spectrally Addressable Liquid Bead Microarrays
Wallace et al.
J. Mol. Diagn. 2005;7:72-80.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

RESPONSE: Re: Have We Resolved How To Triage Equivocal Cervical Cytology?
Solomon and Schiffman
JNCI J Natl Cancer Inst 2004;96:1402-1402.
FULL TEXT  

HPV Communication: Review of Existing Research and Recommendations for Patient Education
Anhang et al.
CA Cancer J Clin 2004;54:248-259.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Validation of p16INK4a as a Marker of Oncogenic Human Papillomavirus Infection in Cervical Biopsies from a Population-Based Cohort in Costa Rica
Wang et al.
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 2004;13:1355-1360.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Human Papillomavirus Testing with the Hybrid Capture 2 Assay and PCR as Screening Tools
Kulmala et al.
J. Clin. Microbiol. 2004;42:2470-2475.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Projected Clinical Benefits and Cost-effectiveness of a Human Papillomavirus 16/18 Vaccine
Goldie et al.
JNCI J Natl Cancer Inst 2004;96:604-615.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Have We Resolved How To Triage Equivocal Cervical Cytology?
Solomon and Schiffman
JNCI J Natl Cancer Inst 2004;96:250-251.
FULL TEXT  

Method for Testing for Human Papillomavirus Infection in Patients with Cervical Intraepithelial Disease
Lin et al.
J. Clin. Microbiol. 2004;42:366-368.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Denaturing High-Performance Liquid Chromatography for Detecting and Typing Genital Human Papillomavirus
Li et al.
J. Clin. Microbiol. 2003;41:5563-5571.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Factors Affecting the Detection Rate of Human Papillomavirus
Harper et al.
Ann Fam Med 2003;1:221-227.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Risk of Cervical Cancer Associated with Extending the Interval between Cervical-Cancer Screenings
Sawaya et al.
NEJM 2003;349:1501-1509.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A Comparison of Single and Combined Visual, Cytologic, and Virologic Tests as Screening Strategies in a Region at High Risk of Cervical Cancer
Ferreccio et al.
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 2003;12:815-823.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Comparison between Prototype Hybrid Capture 3 and Hybrid Capture 2 Human Papillomavirus DNA Assays for Detection of High-Grade Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia and Cancer
Castle et al.
J. Clin. Microbiol. 2003;41:4022-4030.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A Comparison between Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction and Hybrid Capture 2 for Human Papillomavirus DNA Quantitation
Gravitt et al.
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 2003;12:477-484.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Chapter 5: Viral and Host Factors in Human Papillomavirus Persistence and Progression
Wang and Hildesheim
J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 2003;2003:35-40.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Chapter 10: Cervical Cancer Screening Using Visualization Techniques
Wright
J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 2003;2003:66-71.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Chapter 12: Human Papillomavirus Technologies
Iftner and Villa
J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 2003;2003:80-88.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Chapter 13: Primary Screening of Cervical Cancer With Human Papillomavirus Tests
Franco
J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 2003;2003:89-96.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Human Papillomavirus and Cervical Cancer
Burd
Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2003;16:1-17.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Baseline Cytology, Human Papillomavirus Testing, and Risk for Cervical Neoplasia: A 10-Year Cohort Analysis
Sherman et al.
JNCI J Natl Cancer Inst 2003;95:46-52.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Restricted Cross-Reactivity of Hybrid Capture 2 with Nononcogenic Human Papillomavirus Types
Castle et al.
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 2002;11:1394-1399.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

American Cancer Society Guideline for the Early Detection of Cervical Neoplasia and Cancer
Saslow et al.
CA Cancer J Clin 2002;52:342-362.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Costs and Benefits of Different Strategies to Screen for Cervical Cancer in Less-Developed Countries
Mandelblatt et al.
JNCI J Natl Cancer Inst 2002;94:1469-1483.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A Prospective Study of High-Grade Cervical Neoplasia Risk Among Human Papillomavirus-Infected Women
Castle et al.
JNCI J Natl Cancer Inst 2002;94:1406-1414.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Benefits and Costs of Using HPV Testing to Screen for Cervical Cancer
Mandelblatt et al.
JAMA 2002;287:2372-2381.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The causal relation between human papillomavirus and cervical cancer
Bosch et al.
J. Clin. Pathol. 2002;55:244-265.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Results of Human Papillomavirus DNA Testing with the Hybrid Capture 2 Assay Are Reproducible
Castle et al.
J. Clin. Microbiol. 2002;40:1088-1090.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Effects of Age and Human Papilloma Viral Load on Colposcopy Triage: Data From the Randomized Atypical Squamous Cells of Undetermined Significance/Low-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion Triage Study (ALTS)
Sherman et al.
JNCI J Natl Cancer Inst 2002;94:102-107.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

HPV for Cervical Cancer Screening: Is the Era of the Molecular Pap Smear Upon Us?
Stoler
J. Histochem. Cytochem. 2001;49:1197-1198.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Prevalence and Risk Factors for Anal Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions in Women
Holly et al.
JNCI J Natl Cancer Inst 2001;93:843-849.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Recent advances: Sexually transmitted infections
Gilson and Mindel
BMJ 2001;322:1160-1164.
FULL TEXT  

Cervical cancer: epidemiology, prevention and the role of human papillomavirus infection
Franco et al.
CMAJ 2001;164:1017-1025.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Papillomavirus research update: highlights of the Barcelona HPV 2000 international papillomavirus conference
Bosch et al.
J. Clin. Pathol. 2001;54:163-175.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Comparison of Three Management Strategies for Patients With Atypical Squamous Cells of Undetermined Significance: Baseline Results From a Randomized Trial
Solomon et al.
JNCI J Natl Cancer Inst 2001;93:293-299.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Human Papillomavirus Type 16 Variants and Risk of Cervical Cancer
Hildesheim et al.
JNCI J Natl Cancer Inst 2001;93:315-318.
FULL TEXT  

Screening for Cervical Cancer
Wright Jr. et al.
Science 2000;290:1651a-1651.
FULL TEXT  

Human Papillomavirus Testing for Primary Screening of Cervical Cancer Precursors
Ratnam et al.
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 2000;9:945-951.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Human Papillomavirus Testing as a Screening Tool for Cervical Cancer
Koss et al.
JAMA 2000;283:2525-2526.
FULL TEXT  

Population-Based Study of Human Papillomavirus Infection and Cervical Neoplasia in Rural Costa Rica
Herrero et al.
JNCI J Natl Cancer Inst 2000;92:464-474.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Emerging Technologies and Cervical Cancer
Follen and Richards-Kortum
JNCI J Natl Cancer Inst 2000;92:363-365.
FULL TEXT  

Human Papillomavirus Testing: Replacement for Pap Smear?
JWatch Infect. Diseases 2000;2000:3-3.
FULL TEXT  

Human Papillomavirus Testing for Primary Cervical Cancer Screening
Cuzick
JAMA 2000;283:108-109.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2000 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.