You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 283 No. 1, January 5, 2000 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Special Communication
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (28)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Lipids and Lipid Disorders
 •Treatment Adherence
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Clinical Goals and Performance Measures for Cholesterol Management in Secondary Prevention of Coronary Heart Disease

Thomas H. Lee, MD; James I. Cleeman, MD; Scott M. Grundy, MD; Clayton Gillett; Richard C. Pasternak, MD; Joshua Seidman; Cary Sennett, MD

JAMA. 2000;283:94-98.

Guidelines from the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) recommend reduction of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) to 100 mg/dL (2.59 mmol/L) or less in patients with established coronary heart disease (CHD). However, the National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA) is implementing a new performance measure as part of the Health Plan Employer and Data Information Set (HEDIS) that appears to endorse a different target. The new HEDIS measure will require managed care organizations seeking NCQA accreditation to measure and report the percentage of patients who have had major CHD events who achieve LDL-C levels less than 130 mg/dL (3.36 mmol/L) between 60 and 365 days after discharge. These different LDL-C thresholds emphasize the difference between a clinical goal for the management of individual patients (<=100 mg/dL) and a performance measure used to evaluate the care of a population of patients (<130 mg/dL). This article discusses the rationale for each threshold and explains the use of 2 different thresholds for these 2 purposes. Both the NCQA and NCEP expect that the new HEDIS measure will encourage managed care organizations to develop systems that improve secondary prevention of CHD.


Author Affiliations: Partners Community HealthCare Inc (Dr Lee), Brigham and Women's Hospital (Dr Lee), Harvard Medical School (Drs Lee and Pasternak), and Massachusetts General Hospital (Dr Pasternak), Boston; National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Bethesda, Md (Dr Cleeman); University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (Dr Grundy); Clinical Planning and Improvement, Group Health Cooperative, Seattle, Wash (Mr Gillett); and the National Committee for Quality Assurance, Washington, DC (Dr Sennett and Mr Seidman). Drs Lee and Sennett and Messrs Gillett and Seidman were selected by the National Committee for Quality Assurance and Drs Cleeman, Grundy, and Pasternak were selected by the National Cholesterol Education Program to participate in developing this article.



THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Relationship between quality of care and racial disparities in medicare health plans.
Trivedi et al.
JAMA 2006;296:1998-2004.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

International Prevalence, Recognition, and Treatment of Cardiovascular Risk Factors in Outpatients With Atherothrombosis
Bhatt et al.
JAMA 2006;295:180-189.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Quality Assessment of Dyslipidemia in Managed Care: Current Best Evidence Should Be Used to Benchmark Quality
Nair and Saseen
The Annals of Pharmacotherapy 2006;40:124-127.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Goal attainment in patients referred to a telephone-based dyslipidemia program
Palmieri et al.
Am J Health Syst Pharm 2005;62:1586-1591.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Disparities in Use of Lipid-Lowering Medications Among People With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
Safford et al.
Arch Intern Med 2003;163:922-928.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A Community-Wide Survey of Physician Practices and Attitudes Toward Cholesterol Management in Patients With Recent Acute Myocardial Infarction
Yarzebski et al.
Arch Intern Med 2002;162:797-804.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Diabetes Quality Improvement Project: Moving science into health policy to gain an edge on the diabetes epidemic
Fleming et al.
Diabetes Care 2001;24:1815-1820.
FULL TEXT  

Temporal Trends (1986-1997) in Cholesterol Level Assessment and Management Practices in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Population-Based Perspective
Yarzebski et al.
Arch Intern Med 2001;161:1521-1528.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Quality Of Care For Coronary Heart Disease In Two Countries
Ayanian and Quinn
Health Aff (Millwood) 2001;20:55-67.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Improving Lipid Evaluation and Management in Medicare Patients Hospitalized for Acute Myocardial Infarction
Malach et al.
Arch Intern Med 2001;161:839-844.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Gaps In Quality of Cardiovascular Care Transcend Social Bias
Lee
Circulation 2000;102:943-944.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2000 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.