You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 296 No. 14, October 11, 2006 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  The Rational Clinical Examination
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •CME Course for This Article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (8)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related letters
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Diagnosis
 •The Rational Clinical Examination
 •Pain
 •Physical Examination
 •Alert me on articles by topic

CLINICIAN'S CORNER
Do Opiates Affect the Clinical Evaluation of Patients With Acute Abdominal Pain?

Sumant R. Ranji, MD; L. Elizabeth Goldman, MD; David L. Simel, MD, MHS; Kaveh G. Shojania, MD

JAMA. 2006;296:1764-1774.

Context  Clinicians have traditionally withheld opiate analgesia from patients with acute abdominal pain until after evaluation by a surgeon, out of concern that analgesia may alter the physical findings and interfere with diagnosis.

Objective  To determine the impact of opiate analgesics on the rational clinical examination and operative decision for patients with acute abdominal pain.

Data Sources and Study Selection  MEDLINE (through May 2006), EMBASE, and hand searches of article bibliographies to identify placebo-controlled randomized trials of opiate analgesia reporting changes in the history, physical examination findings, or diagnostic errors (those resulting in "management errors," defined as the performance of unnecessary surgery or failure to perform necessary surgery in a timely fashion).

Data Extraction  Two authors independently reviewed each study, abstracted data, and classified study quality. A third reviewer independently resolved discrepancies.

Data Synthesis  Studies both in adults (9 trials) and in children (3 trials) showed trends toward increased risks of altered findings on the abdominal examination due to opiate administration, with risk ratios for changes in the examination of 1.51 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.85 to 2.69) and 2.11 (95% CI, 0.60 to 7.35), respectively. When the analysis was restricted to the 8 adult and pediatric trials that reported significantly greater analgesia for patients who received opiates compared with those who received placebo, the risk of physical examination changes became significant (risk ratio, 2.13; 95% CI, 1.14 to 3.98). These trials exhibited significant heterogeneity (I2 = 68.6%; P = .002), and only 2 trials distinguished clinically significant changes such as loss of peritoneal signs from all other changes; consequently, we analyzed risk of management errors as a marker for important changes in the physical examination. Opiate administration had no significant association with management errors (+0.3% absolute increase; 95% CI, –4.1% to +4.7%). The 3 pediatric trials showed a nonsignificant absolute decrease in management errors (–0.8%; 95% CI, –8.6% to +6.9%). Across adult and pediatric trials with adequate analgesia, opiate administration was associated with a nonsignificant absolute decrease in the risk of management errors (–0.2%; 95% CI, –4.0% to +3.6%).

Conclusions  Opiate administration may alter the physical examination findings, but these changes result in no significant increase in management errors. The existing literature does not rule out a small increase in errors, but this error rate reflects a conservative definition in which surgeries labeled as either delayed or unnecessary may have met appropriate standards of care. In published research reports, no patient experienced major morbidity or mortality attributable to opiate administration.


Author Affiliations: Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco (Drs Ranji and Goldman); Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center and Department of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC (Dr Simel); and Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa and Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Health Research Institute; Ottawa, Ontario (Dr Shojania).


RELATED LETTERS

Opiates and Acute Abdominal Pain
Daniele Radzik, Jenny Bua, and Federico Marchetti
JAMA. 2007;297(5):467-468.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Opiates and Acute Abdominal Pain—Reply
Sumant R. Ranji, L. Elizabeth Goldman, David L. Simel, and Kaveh G. Shojania
JAMA. 2007;297(5):468.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

RELATED ARTICLE

Acute Abdominal Pain
John L. Zeller, Alison E. Burke, and Richard M. Glass
JAMA. 2006;296(14):1800.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Update in Critical Care 2006
Milbrandt et al.
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2007;175:638-648.
FULL TEXT  

Opiates and Acute Abdominal Pain
Radzik et al.
JAMA 2007;297:467-468.
FULL TEXT  

Review: opiate administration may alter physical examination findings but does not increase management errors in acute abdominal pain
Edmonds
Evid. Based Med. 2007;12:23-23.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2006 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.