You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 302 No. 6, August 12, 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Clinical Crossroads: Conferences With Patients and Doctors
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Author in the Room® Teleconference
 •CME Course for This Article
 • Submit Response to Patient's Crossroads
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 • Readers Responses
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Medical Practice
 •Law and Medicine
 •Medical Ethics
 •Oncology
 •Skin Cancer
 •Dermatology
 •Dermatologic Disorders
 •Patient-Physician Relationship/ Care
 •Patient-Physician Communication
 •Quality of Care
 •Patient Safety/ Medical Error
 •Surgery
 •Surgical Interventions
 •Melanoma
 •Surgical Oncology
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

CLINICIAN'S CORNER
A 62-Year-Old Woman With Skin Cancer Who Experienced Wrong-Site Surgery

Review of Medical Error

Thomas H. Gallagher, MD, Discussant

JAMA. 2009;302(6):669-677.

After a life-threatening complication of an injection for neck pain several years ago, Ms W experienced a wrong-site surgery to remove a squamous cell lesion from her nose, followed by pain, distress, and shaken trust in clinicians. Her experience highlights the challenges of communicating with patients after errors. Harmful medical errors occur relatively frequently. Gaps exist between patients' expectations for disclosure and apology and physicians' ability to deliver disclosures well. This discrepancy reflects clinicians' fear of litigation, concern that disclosure might harm patients, and lack of confidence in disclosure skills. Many institutions are developing disclosure programs, and some are reporting success in coupling disclosures with early offers of compensation to patients. However, much has yet to be learned about effective disclosure strategies. Important future developments include increased emphasis on institutions' responsibility for disclosure, involving trainees and other team members in disclosure, and strengthening the relationship between disclosure and quality improvement.


Author Affiliation: Dr Gallagher is Associate Professor, Departments of Medicine and Bioethics and Humanities, University of Washington, Seattle.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Entering the Second Decade of the Patient Safety Movement: The Field Matures: Comment on "Disclosure of Hospital Adverse Events and Its Association With Patients' Ratings of the Quality of Care"
Wachter
Arch Intern Med 2009;169:1894-1896.
FULL TEXT  



RAPID RESPONSES TO THIS ARTICLE

Expectations and Responses in Medical Error Disclosure
John C. Moskop
JAMA Online, 8 Aug 2009.
TEXT 



HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2009 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.