You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 302 No. 7, August 19, 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Original Contribution
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •JAMA Report Video
 •Author in the Room® Teleconference
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related articles
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Viral Infections
 •Immunization
 •Quality of Care
 •Patient Safety/ Medical Error
 •Drug Therapy
 •Adverse Effects
 •Infectious Diseases
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Postlicensure Safety Surveillance for Quadrivalent Human Papillomavirus Recombinant Vaccine

Barbara A. Slade, MD, MS; Laura Leidel, RN, FNP-C, MPH; Claudia Vellozzi, MD, MPH; Emily Jane Woo, MD, MPH; Wei Hua, MD, PhD; Andrea Sutherland, MD, MSc, MPH; Hector S. Izurieta, MD, MPH; Robert Ball, MD, MPH; Nancy Miller, MD; M. Miles Braun, MD, MPH; Lauri E. Markowitz, MD; John Iskander, MD

JAMA. 2009;302(7):750-757.

Context  In June 2006, the Food and Drug Administration licensed the quadrivalent human papillomavirus (types 6, 11, 16, and 18) recombinant vaccine (qHPV) in the United States for use in females aged 9 to 26 years; the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices then recommended qHPV for routine vaccination of girls aged 11 to 12 years.

Objective  To summarize reports to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) following receipt of qHPV.

Design, Setting, and Participants  Review and describe adverse events following immunization (AEFIs) reported to VAERS, a national, voluntary, passive surveillance system, from June 1, 2006, through December 31, 2008. Additional analyses were performed for some AEFIs in prelicensure trials, those of unusual severity, or those that had received public attention. Statistical data mining, including proportional reporting ratios (PRRs) and empirical Bayesian geometric mean methods, were used to detect disproportionality in reporting.

Main Outcome Measures  Numbers of reported AEFIs, reporting rates (reports per 100 000 doses of distributed vaccine or per person-years at risk), and comparisons with expected background rates.

Results  VAERS received 12 424 reports of AEFIs following qHPV distribution, a rate of 53.9 reports per 100 000 doses distributed. A total of 772 reports (6.2% of all reports) described serious AEFIs, including 32 reports of death. The reporting rates per 100 000 qHPV doses distributed were 8.2 for syncope; 7.5 for local site reactions; 6.8 for dizziness; 5.0 for nausea; 4.1 for headache; 3.1 for hypersensitivity reactions; 2.6 for urticaria; 0.2 for venous thromboembolic events, autoimmune disorders, and Guillain-Barré syndrome; 0.1 for anaphylaxis and death; 0.04 for transverse myelitis and pancreatitis; and 0.009 for motor neuron disease. Disproportional reporting of syncope and venous thromboembolic events was noted with data mining methods.

Conclusions  Most of the AEFI rates were not greater than the background rates compared with other vaccines, but there was disproportional reporting of syncope and venous thromboembolic events. The significance of these findings must be tempered with the limitations (possible underreporting) of a passive reporting system.


Author Affiliations: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia (Drs Slade, Vellozzi, Markowitz, and Iskander and Ms Leidel); US Food and Drug Administration,Washington, DC (Drs Woo, Hua, Sutherland, Izurieta, Ball, Miller, and Braun).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLES

Marketing HPV Vaccine: Implications for Adolescent Health and Medical Professionalism
Sheila M. Rothman and David J. Rothman
JAMA. 2009;302(7):781-786.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Risks and Benefits of HPV Vaccination
Charlotte Haug
JAMA. 2009;302(7):795-796.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

HPV Vaccine: Postlicensure Safety Data
Rathore
AAP Grand Rounds 2009;22:51-51.
FULL TEXT  

Cost effectiveness analysis of including boys in a human papillomavirus vaccination programme in the United States
Kim and Goldie
BMJ 2009;339:b3884-b3884.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

New data show HPV4 vaccine safe, effective
Bocchini
AAP News 2009;30:1-1.
FULL TEXT  

Quadrivalent HPV Vaccine: Postlicensure Safety Data and Marketing Controversies
JWatch Women's Health 2009;2009:1-1.
FULL TEXT  

All you need to read in the other general journals
BMJ 2009;339:b3437-b3437.
FULL TEXT  

The Risks and Benefits of HPV Vaccination
Haug
JAMA 2009;302:795-796.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2009 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.