You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 279 No. 15, April 15, 1998 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Letters
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (1)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Local Anesthesia for Infants Undergoing Circumcision

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

To the Editor.—Dr Lander and colleagues1 have shown once again the value and safety of anesthesia for neonatal circumcision. In this study, local infiltration ring block or dorsal penile nerve block resulted in less heart rate elevation and less crying during the circumcision procedure. Outcome measures said to have been investigated included heart rate, respiratory rate, oxygen saturation, palmar sweat, sleep-wake states, crying, motor responses, and methemoglobin level. Only heart rate, crying, and methemoglobin levels were reported, and the reader assumes that no significant changes were found in the remaining parameters.

A larger prospective, controlled, double-blinded study of the effectiveness of penile nerve block by Arnett et al2 showed not only significantly less heart rate elevation and less crying in the anesthetized infant, but also demonstrated significant decrease in oxygen saturation when circumcision was done without anesthesia. Although Lander et al followed the technique of Kirya and Werthmann3 for . . . [Full Text of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

Comparison of Ring Block, Dorsal Penile Nerve Block, and Topical Anesthesia for Neonatal Circumcision: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Janice Lander, Barbara Brady-Fryer, James B. Metcalfe, Shemin Nazarali, and Sarah Muttitt
JAMA. 1997;278(24):2157-2162.
ABSTRACT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

The Circumcision Issue
Bloom and Koo
CLIN PEDIATR 1999;38:243-244.
 





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1998 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.