You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 283 No. 5, February 2, 2000 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Editorial
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (13)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Sex Bias in Cardiovascular Care

Should Women Be Treated More Like Men?

Daniel B. Mark, MD, MPH

JAMA. 2000;283:659-661.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

Cardiovascular disease is the principal cause of death for both men and women. However, since 1984 more women than men have died of this disease.1 Thus, any suggestion that cardiovascular care is biased against women has major public health implications and must be examined carefully. If true, such bias would represent a severe failing of the modern medical system. Since Tobin et al2 reported more than a decade ago that women with abnormal nuclear exercise studies were referred far less often than men for cardiac catheterization and coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery, a host of additional studies have confirmed important sex-based differences in many aspects of care for coronary artery disease (CAD).3-4 Some reports have suggested that these differences are the result of physician bias.

In evaluating possible sex biases in the diagnosis and treatment of CAD, researchers must account for important differences in . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Author Affiliation: Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

Sex Differences in Evaluation and Outcome of Unstable Angina
Véronique L. Roger, Michael E. Farkouh, Susan A. Weston, Guy S. Reeder, Steven J. Jacobsen, Alan R. Zinsmeister, Barbara P. Yawn, Stephen L. Kopecky, and Sherine E. Gabriel
JAMA. 2000;283(5):646-652.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Gender Differences in Hospital Mortality and Use of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Acute Myocardial Infarction: Microsimulation Analysis of the 1999 Nationwide French Hospitals Database
Milcent et al.
Circulation 2007;115:833-839.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Women and Heart Disease: The Role of Diabetes and Hyperglycemia
Barrett-Connor et al.
Arch Intern Med 2004;164:934-942.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Predicting Panic Disorder Among Patients With Chest Pain: An Analysis of the Literature
Huffman and Pollack
Psychosomatics 2003;44:222-236.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Differences in Prognostic Factors and Outcomes Between Women and Men Undergoing Coronary Artery Stenting
Mehilli et al.
JAMA 2000;284:1799-1805.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2000 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.