You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 286 No. 7, August 15, 2001 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Editorial
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (6)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related letter
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Pacemakers/ Defibrillators
 •Cardiovascular System
 •Quality of Care
 •Patient Safety/ Medical Error
 •Arrhythmias
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Safety Alerts Involving Device Therapy for Arrhythmias

Kim A. Eagle, MD

JAMA. 2001;286:843-844.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

Technological developments in device therapy for both bradyarrhythmias and tachyarrhythmias have benefited hundreds of thousands of patients over the past several decades. By the end of 2000, more than 900 000 persons in the United States had a pacemaker or implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) generator.1 The benefits of modern-day pacing and defibrillator therapy on both quality and quantity of life are well documented.2-4 Moreover, the recent receipt of an ICD by Vice President Richard Cheney has resulted in increased public awareness about the use and capabilities of these devices.

In this issue of THE JOURNAL, Maisel and colleagues1 report the frequency with which pacemakers and ICDs have been subject to safety alerts and recalls during the past decade. The authors report that from 1990 through 2000, 52 advisories were issued, involving more than 400 000 pacemakers and more than 100 000 ICDs. The frequency of these alerts and the numbers . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Author Affiliations: Division of Cardiovascular Disease, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED LETTER

Safety of Implantable Cardiac Devices
Marshall S. Stanton, William H. Maisel, William G. Stevenson, Laurence M. Epstein, and Kim A. Eagle
JAMA. 2002;287(7):839-840.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

RELATED ARTICLE

Recalls and Safety Alerts Involving Pacemakers and Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Generators
William H. Maisel, Michael O. Sweeney, William G. Stevenson, Kristin E. Ellison, and Laurence M. Epstein
JAMA. 2001;286(7):793-799.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Pacemaker and ICD generator malfunctions: analysis of Food and Drug Administration annual reports.
Maisel et al.
JAMA 2006;295:1901-1906.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Combining Resynchronization and Defibrillation Therapies for Heart Failure
Bradley
JAMA 2003;289:2719-2721.
FULL TEXT  

Safety of Implantable Cardiac Devices
Stanton et al.
JAMA 2002;287:839-840.
FULL TEXT  

FDA Advisories for Antiarrhythmic Devices on the Rise
Journal Watch Cardiology 2001;2001:6-6.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2001 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.