This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citing articles on Web of Science (2)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in JAMA  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Brian Vastag

JAMA. 2002;288:1973.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

Washington—After an exhaustive 18-month review, an Institute of Medicine (IOM) committee has handed down broad recommendations for overhauling the nation's fractured system of human research protections. The report advocates sweeping changes at the national, institutional, and community levels, including comprehensive monitoring of all research, revamping strained institutional review boards (IRBs), and providing litigation-free compensation for participants harmed during research.

The current arrangement—federally funded institutions generally police themselves while industry answers to the Food and Drug Administration—is so disparate that estimates of the number of research volunteers in the United States vary from 2 to 20 million, said committee chair Daniel Federman, MD, distinguished professor of medicine and medical education at Harvard Medical School.

NATIONAL EFFORT SOUGHT

That alarming range prompted the committee's first recommendation, the establishment of a national data collection effort to track research participation. While Congress and various medical organizations ponder how to implement such . . . [Full Text of this Article]

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?