This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Related articles  • Similar articles in JAMA  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

In Reply: Drs Port and Jennerich note that the coefficients we cited for the Cox model for both SBP and DBP are inconsistent with the Figure. These results represent 2 approaches to the study of blood pressure and risk of cardiovascular mortality, one based on a regression model which assumes a log-linear relationship with blood pressure, and one which classifies participants by blood pressure levels, and which makes no assumption about log-linearity. Both approaches are valid. The apparent inconsistency arises in part because the Cox coefficients cited are for all men and the Figure gives rates for 2 separate age groups, and in part because numbers of deaths and participants in the high SBP and low DBP categories (the discordant group) are much smaller than numbers in the high SBP and high DBP groups (concordant group). Thus, the positive association dominates when a log-linear model is fitted. Perhaps we failed . . . [Full Text of this Article]

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLES

Pulse Pressure and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease
Sidney C. Port and Robert R. Jennrich
JAMA. 2003;289(2):174.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Pulse Pressure and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease
Travis S. Hiles and Patrick M. Moriarty
JAMA. 2003;289(2):174-175.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT