You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 289 No. 4, January 22, 2003 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Letters
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related articles
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Splinting vs Surgery for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 130 words of the full text and any section headings.

To the Editor: I have several concerns about the study by Dr Gerritsen and colleagues.1 First, nerve latencies (even if converted to conduction velocities) are not the best measure either for diagnosis or severity. Amplitudes of compound muscle action or sensory action potentials both proximal and distal to carpal tunnel are the most accurate measures. Second, the outcome measures (except for latencies) are purely subjective, and neither patient nor evaluator were effectively blinded. Third, it is inappropriate to compare adverse effects of the 2 treatments purely on the basis of aggregated numbers, which may obscure a wide range of complications. Reflex sympathetic dystrophy, wound hematoma, and painful scars are not comparable with discomfort from a brace.

Ernest W. Johnson, MD
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Ohio State University
Columbus

1. Gerritsen AAM, de Vet HCW, Scholten RJPM, Bertelsmann FW, de Krom MCTF, Bouter LM. Splinting vs surgery in the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2002;288:1245-1251. FREE FULL TEXT

Letters Section Editor: Stephen J. Lurie, MD, PhD, Senior Editor.

JAMA. 2003;289:420.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLES

Splinting vs Surgery for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
Margit L. Bleecker
JAMA. 2003;289(4):420.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Splinting vs Surgery for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
Daniel L. Menkes
JAMA. 2003;289(4):420-421.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Splinting vs Surgery for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
Benjamin M. Sucher
JAMA. 2003;289(4):421.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Splinting vs Surgery for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
Andrea Klauser and Michael Schirmer
JAMA. 2003;289(4):421.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Splinting vs Surgery for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
Annette A. M. Gerritsen, Henrica C. W. de Vet, Rob J. P. M. Scholten, Frits W. Bertelsmann, Marc C. T. F. M. de Krom, and Lex M. Bouter
JAMA. 2003;289(4):421-422.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Splinting vs Surgery for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
Michael I. Weintraub
JAMA. 2003;289(4):422.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Splinting vs Surgery for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
E. F. Shaw Wilgis
JAMA. 2003;289(4):422-423.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2003 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.