You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 289 No. 4, January 22, 2003 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Letters
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related articles
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Splinting vs Surgery for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

To the Editor: In their study, Dr Gerritsen and colleagues1 confirmed the diagnosis of CTS with electrophysiological testing. It is possible, however, that discrepancies between functional nerve conduction studies and structural imaging techniques may predict response to conservative or surgical treatment. It appears that conventional sonography has less sensitivity than nerve conduction studies (0.70 vs 0.98, respectively), but greater specificity (0.63 vs 0.19, respectively).2 Inclusion of sonographic measurement of the median nerve cross-sectional area performs even better, with sensitivity as high as 89% and a specificity of 83%.3 Higher ultrasound frequencies (<=15 MHz) allow excellent resolution for differentiation of mild nerve alterations.4 Addition of color Doppler sonography could further help in delineation of an underlying inflammatory process.

Furthermore, local corticosteroid injection is an anti-inflammatory conservative approach.5 In one study, 50% of patients (compared with 7% of controls) did not need a further treatment after a single local injection of . . . [Full Text of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLES

Splinting vs Surgery for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
Margit L. Bleecker
JAMA. 2003;289(4):420.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Splinting vs Surgery for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
Ernest W. Johnson
JAMA. 2003;289(4):420.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Splinting vs Surgery for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
Daniel L. Menkes
JAMA. 2003;289(4):420-421.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Splinting vs Surgery for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
Benjamin M. Sucher
JAMA. 2003;289(4):421.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Splinting vs Surgery for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
Annette A. M. Gerritsen, Henrica C. W. de Vet, Rob J. P. M. Scholten, Frits W. Bertelsmann, Marc C. T. F. M. de Krom, and Lex M. Bouter
JAMA. 2003;289(4):421-422.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Splinting vs Surgery for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
Michael I. Weintraub
JAMA. 2003;289(4):422.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Splinting vs Surgery for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
E. F. Shaw Wilgis
JAMA. 2003;289(4):422-423.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Splinting vs Surgery in the Treatment of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Annette A. M. Gerritsen, Henrica C. W. de Vet, Rob J. P. M. Scholten, Frits W. Bertelsmann, Marc C. T. F. M. de Krom, and Lex M. Bouter
JAMA. 2002;288(10):1245-1251.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2003 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.