You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 289 No. 4, January 22, 2003 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Commentary
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (11)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related letters
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Medical Practice
 •Law and Medicine
 •Drug Therapy
 •Adverse Effects
 •Drug Therapy, Other
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Direct-to-Consumer Advertising and Shared Liability for Pharmaceutical Manufacturers

Michelle M. Mello, JD, PhD; Meredith Rosenthal, PhD; Peter J. Neumann, ScD

JAMA. 2003;289:477-481.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

During the last several years, the marketing of prescription drugs has undergone substantial change, facilitated by changes in the regulatory environment governing direct-to-consumer advertising (DTCA). Since the release in 1997 of new draft guidance by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA),1 consumer-oriented drug marketing has become pervasive, particularly in broadcast media. Ninety-one percent of US individuals report having seen consumer-oriented drug advertisements, and the pharmaceutical industry spent nearly $2.5 billion on DTCA in 2000.2

Health services researchers are hard at work trying to understand the impact of DTCA on the marketplace, the patient-physician relationship, and public health. Meanwhile, the courts and the FDA are reviewing the existing legal structures to determine whether they require modification in light of the upsurge in DTCA.3 Historically, under a common-law doctrine called the learned intermediary rule (LIR), manufacturers have only been required . . . [Full Text of this Article]

A Sea Change in the Law

Author Affiliation: Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Mass.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED LETTERS

Liability for Adverse Events in Direct-to-Consumer Advertising
David Shein
JAMA. 2003;289(20):2646.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Liability for Adverse Events in Direct-to-Consumer Advertising
George W. Evans and Arnold I. Friede
JAMA. 2003;289(20):2646-2647.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Symposium: Introducing Technology into Orthopaedic Practice. How Should It Be Done?
Callaghan et al.
JBJS 2005;87:1146-1158.
FULL TEXT  

Influence of Patients' Requests for Direct-to-Consumer Advertised Antidepressants: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Kravitz et al.
JAMA 2005;293:1995-2002.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Direct-to-Consumer Advertising: A Haphazard Approach to Health Promotion
Hollon
JAMA 2005;293:2030-2033.
FULL TEXT  

Liability for Adverse Events in Direct-to-Consumer Advertising
Shein
JAMA 2003;289:2646-2646.
FULL TEXT  

Liability for Adverse Events in Direct-to-Consumer Advertising
Evans and Friede
JAMA 2003;289:2646-2647.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2003 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.