 |
 |

Ethics, the Constitution, and the Dying Process
The Case of Theresa Marie Schiavo
Lawrence O. Gostin, JD
JAMA. 2005;293:2403-2407.
 |
 |
| Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings. |
|
 |
 |
Federal and state courts have reached a broad consensus on matters of death and dying since the seminal cases of Karen Ann Quinlan in 19761 and Nancy Cruzan in 1990.2 So too has there been substantial consensus in the bioethics literature.3 Courts and scholars have affirmed a persons right to refuse life-sustaining treatment and concluded that this right remains intact even if the person is no longer able to speak for herself.4 Near relatives and the courts should adopt the same course of action the person would have chosen if competent.5
If there is a broad judicial and scholarly consensus, then why were political leaders and the public so troubled by the heart-wrenching circumstances of Theresa Marie (Terri) Schiavo? A skeptical observer might conclude that the controversy was politically generated, fed by vivid media images of a young, vulnerable woman who appeared sentient. After all, the . . . [Full Text of this Article] Terri Schiavo: Facts and Judicial History
Author Affiliation: Georgetown University Law Center, Washington, DC.
CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter
What's this?
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
Theresa Schiavo's tragedy and ours, too
Bernat
Neurology 2008;71:964-965.
FULL TEXT
Controlling Death: The False Promise of Advance Directives
Perkins
ANN INTERN MED 2007;147:51-57.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Epidemiology and prognosis of coma in daytime television dramas
Casarett et al.
BMJ 2005;331:1537-1539.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
The American Public and the Terri Schiavo Case
Blendon et al.
Arch Intern Med 2005;165:2580-2584.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
|