You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 293 No. 19, May 18, 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Commentary
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (18)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Medical Practice
 •Health Policy
 •Law and Medicine
 •Medical Ethics
 •Neurology
 •Coma/ Vegetative State
 •Patient-Physician Relationship/ Care
 •End-of-life Care/ Palliative Medicine
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Ethics, the Constitution, and the Dying Process

The Case of Theresa Marie Schiavo

Lawrence O. Gostin, JD

JAMA. 2005;293:2403-2407.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

Federal and state courts have reached a broad consensus on matters of death and dying since the seminal cases of Karen Ann Quinlan in 19761 and Nancy Cruzan in 1990.2 So too has there been substantial consensus in the bioethics literature.3 Courts and scholars have affirmed a person’s right to refuse life-sustaining treatment and concluded that this right remains intact even if the person is no longer able to speak for herself.4 Near relatives and the courts should adopt the same course of action the person would have chosen if competent.5

If there is a broad judicial and scholarly consensus, then why were political leaders and the public so troubled by the heart-wrenching circumstances of Theresa Marie (Terri) Schiavo? A skeptical observer might conclude that the controversy was politically generated, fed by vivid media images of a young, vulnerable woman who appeared sentient. After all, the . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Terri Schiavo: Facts and Judicial History

Author Affiliation: Georgetown University Law Center, Washington, DC.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Theresa Schiavo's tragedy and ours, too
Bernat
Neurology 2008;71:964-965.
FULL TEXT  

Controlling Death: The False Promise of Advance Directives
Perkins
ANN INTERN MED 2007;147:51-57.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Epidemiology and prognosis of coma in daytime television dramas
Casarett et al.
BMJ 2005;331:1537-1539.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The American Public and the Terri Schiavo Case
Blendon et al.
Arch Intern Med 2005;165:2580-2584.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2005 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.