 |
 |

Endocarditis From Staphylococcus aureus
 |
 |
| Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings. |
|
 |
 |
To the Editor: In reading the study of S aureus endocarditis by Dr Fowler and colleagues,1 I was struck by a possible discrepancy in the figures relating S viridans to antecedent dental procedures. Table 1 indicated that of 1779 patients with endocarditis, 558 cases were due to S aureus, while many other pathogens were isolated from the remaining 1221 patients. This included 319 patients with viridans group streptococci, about 18% of the study population. However, Table 2 shows dental procedures listed for only 127 patients (10.4%) with nonS aureus endocarditis and 18 patients (3.2%) with S aureus. Together they total 145, only 8.2% of the entire study population.
My question concerns the 174 patients who would be needed to supplement these 145 to achieve the 319 with viridans group streptococci. It appears that S viridans, an oral bacterium, was found in many patients with nondentally related endocarditis. . . . [Full Text of this Article]
Mortimer Lorber, DMD, MD
melorber@aol.com Department of Physiology and Biophysics Georgetown University School of Medicine Washington, DC
CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter
What's this?
RELATED ARTICLES
Endocarditis From Staphylococcus aureus
Taishiro Chikamori
JAMA. 2005;294(23):2972.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Endocarditis From Staphylococcus aureusReply
Vance G. Fowler, Jr
JAMA. 2005;294(23):2972-2973.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Staphylococcus aureus Endocarditis: A Consequence of Medical Progress
Vance G. Fowler, Jr, Jose M. Miro, Bruno Hoen, Christopher H. Cabell, Elias Abrutyn, Ethan Rubinstein, G. Ralph Corey, Denis Spelman, Suzanne F. Bradley, Bruno Barsic, Paul A. Pappas, Kevin J. Anstrom, Dannah Wray, Claudio Q. Fortes, Ignasi Anguera, Eugene Athan, Philip Jones, Jan T. M. van der Meer, Tom S. J. Elliott, Donald P. Levine, Arnold S. Bayer, and for the ICE Investigators
JAMA. 2005;293(24):3012-3021.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
|