You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 296 No. 11, September 20, 2006 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Letters
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related articles
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Revascularization
 •Surgical Interventions
 •Cardiovascular/ Cardiothoracic Surgery
 •Cardiovascular Disease/ Myocardial Infarction
 •Cardiovascular Intervention
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Hospital Performance and Acute Coronary Syndrome Outcomes

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

To the Editor: Dr Peterson and colleagues1 evaluated the association between adherence to 9 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) class I guideline-recommended treatments and risk-adjusted in-hospital mortality. The study population included those patients with non–ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome in the CRUSADE (Can Rapid Risk Stratification of Unstable Angina Patients Suppress Adverse Outcomes With Early Implementation of the ACC/AHA Guidelines) registry—a voluntary, self-reported, observational registry. The primary finding was that risk-adjusted in-hospital mortality was 6.31% for the lowest adherence quartile compared with 4.15% for the highest adherence quartile (P<.001). Observational registries are extremely useful for studying large populations or rare conditions. However, they are intrinsically limited by potential selection and reporting bias, confounders, and nonvalidated data, and hence best suited for generating hypotheses rather than proving causality.

One important potential confounder was the exclusion of 9155 patients (11.8% of the cohort) who were transferred from a . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Henry H. Ting, MD, MBA
ting.henry@mayo.edu
Division of Cardiovascular Diseases

Kirsten Hall Long, PhD
Division of Health Care Policy and Research
Department of Health Sciences
Mayo Clinic
Rochester, Minn


RELATED ARTICLES

Hospital Performance and Acute Coronary Syndrome Outcomes—Reply
Eric D. Peterson
JAMA. 2006;296(11):1349-1350.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Association Between Hospital Process Performance and Outcomes Among Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes
Eric D. Peterson, Matthew T. Roe, Jyotsna Mulgund, Elizabeth R. DeLong, Barbara L. Lytle, Ralph G. Brindis, Sidney C. Smith, Jr, Charles V. Pollack, Jr, L. Kristin Newby, Robert A. Harrington, W. Brian Gibler, and E. Magnus Ohman
JAMA. 2006;295(16):1912-1920.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2006 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.