 |
 |

Clinical Trials in Hypertension
 |
 |
| Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings. |
|
 |
 |
To the Editor: In their Commentary, Dr Psaty and colleagues1 stated that recent meta-analyses by Carlberg et al2 and Lindholm et al3 confirm their own previous meta-analysis.4 However, their conclusions in that review were that "the available scientific evidence provides strong support for the current national guidelines, which recommend diuretics and -blockers as first-line agents . . . ." In contrast, Carlberg et al2 concluded that "our results cast doubts on atenolol as a suitable drug for hypertensive patients." Lindholm et al3 concluded that "we believe that -blockers should not remain first choice in the treatment of primary hypertension . . . ."
-Blockers remained first-line therapy for hypertension on an equal basis with diuretics in the Sixth Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure (JNC 6) despite evidence of their inefficacy for this indication.5 As a consequence, atenolol has become the fourth most prescribed drug in the United . . . [Full Text of this Article]
Franz H. Messerli, MD
fmesserli@aol.com Division of Cardiology St Lukes-Roosevelt Hospital Center New York, NY
Gareth Beevers, MD
University Department of Medicine City Hospital Birmingham, England
Stanley S. Franklin, MD
Heart Disease Prevention Program University of California, Irvine
Thomas G. Pickering, MD
Columbia University New York, NY
RELATED ARTICLES
Clinical Trials in Hypertension
Simeon Pollack
JAMA. 2006;296(12):1464.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Clinical Trials in HypertensionReply
Bruce M. Psaty, Noel S. Weiss, and Curt D. Furberg
JAMA. 2006;296(12):1464-1465.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Recent Trials in Hypertension: Compelling Science or Commercial Speech?
Bruce M. Psaty, Noel S. Weiss, and Curt D. Furberg
JAMA. 2006;295(14):1704-1706.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
|