You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 296 No. 14, October 11, 2006 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Editorial
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (2)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Tobacco
 •Health Policy
 •Law and Medicine
 •Occupational and Environmental Medicine
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Banning Smoking in Public Places

Time to Clear the Air

Mark D. Eisner, MD, MPH

JAMA. 2006;296:1778-1779.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

During the past 3 decades, definitive evidence has accumulated that secondhand smoke causes serious disease and shortens life span. The recent surgeon general's report on involuntary exposure to tobacco smoke concluded that secondhand smoke causes lung cancer, coronary heart disease, and premature death.1 Legislation that eliminates public smoking will therefore reduce the burden of chronic disease and premature mortality. The workplace, which is a major source of secondhand smoke exposure, is a particularly important target for preventive strategies.

Recent reports indicate that there are also more immediate respiratory health benefits from mandating smoke-free workplaces. In 1998, our research group2 reported that California legislation banning smoking in bars and taverns led to substantially reduced secondhand smoke exposure among bartenders. In parallel with reduced exposure, the prevalence of sensory irritation symptoms (eye, nose, and throat irritation) and respiratory symptoms (cough, wheeze, and shortness of breath) declined markedly. . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Author Affiliation: Division of Occupational and Environmental Medicine and Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco.


RELATED ARTICLE

Respiratory Symptoms, Pulmonary Function, and Markers of Inflammation Among Bar Workers Before and After a Legislative Ban on Smoking in Public Places
Daniel Menzies, Arun Nair, Peter A. Williamson, Stuart Schembri, Mudher Z. H. Al-Khairalla, Martyn Barnes, Tom C. Fardon, Lesley McFarlane, Gareth J. Magee, and Brian J. Lipworth
JAMA. 2006;296(14):1742-1748.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

A Clash of Rights: Should Smoking Tobacco Products in Public Places be Legally Banned?
Dresler et al.
Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2008;86:699-707.
FULL TEXT  

Effects of the Irish Smoking Ban on Respiratory Health of Bar Workers and Air Quality in Dublin Pubs
Goodman et al.
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2007;175:840-845.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Respiratory Benefits of a Legislative Ban on Smoking in Public Places
JWatch General 2006;2006:3-3.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2006 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.