This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in JAMA  Topic Collections  • Occupational and Environmental Medicine  • World Health  • Alert me on articles by topic

Joan Stephenson, PhD

JAMA. 2006;296:1830.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

The World Health Organization announced last month that it is recommending the use of indoor spraying with the pesticide DDT, or dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane, to help control malaria in regions with high rates of the disease. The agency stopped promoting use of DDT in the early 1980s because of increased concerns about its environmental and health effects.

DDT became widely used as an agricultural pesticide in the 1930s but fell out of favor because of concerns about its effects on wildlife and human health. However, proponents of indoor residual spraying (IRS), which involves applying long-acting insecticides on the walls and roofs of houses and domestic animal shelters, say the environmental impact of such use is minimal.

"One of the best tools we have against malaria is indoor residual house spraying," Arata Kochi, MD, PhD, Director of WHO's Global Malaria Programme, said in a statement. "Of the dozen insecticides WHO . . . [Full Text of this Article]