You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 296 No. 6, August 9, 2006 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Commentary
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (12)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Informatics/ Internet in Medicine
 •Medical Informatics
 •Patient Safety/ Medical Error
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Tracking Progress in Patient Safety

An Elusive Target

Peter J. Pronovost, MD, PhD; Marlene R. Miller, MD, MSc; Robert M. Wachter, MD

JAMA. 2006;296:696-699.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

The fifth anniversary of the Institute of Medicine's report on medical errors prompted widespread reflection on the progress with patient safety.1 Much of this reflection focused on a single question: Are patients safer now? Data from neither the entire US health care system nor individual hospitals can yield a credible answer.2-4

The inability to answer this question is doubly surprising given the increase in publicly available quality measures over the same period. Patients or clinicians can use the Internet to find how often many hospitals in the United States prescribe beta-blockers for Medicare patients with acute myocardial infarction or administer appropriate antibiotics to patients with pneumonia (eg, http://www.hospitalcompare.hhs.gov). However, most of these measures reflect processes of care and quality measures, not safety; apply to relatively small subsets of patients; and, by and large, do not . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Current Methods of Measuring Safety

Author Affiliations: Departments of Anesthesiology and Critical Care (Dr Pronovost) and Pediatrics (Dr Miller), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Md; and Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco (Dr Wachter).



THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

An epistemology of patient safety research: a framework for study design and interpretation. Part 3. End points and measurement
Brown et al.
Qual Saf Health Care 2008;17:170-177.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Reporting Medical Errors to Improve Patient Safety: A Survey of Physicians in Teaching Hospitals
Kaldjian et al.
Arch Intern Med 2008;168:40-46.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A Framework for Health Care Organizations to Develop and Evaluate a Safety Scorecard
Pronovost et al.
JAMA 2007;298:2063-2065.
FULL TEXT  

Mortality as a Measure of Quality: Implications for Palliative and End-of-Life Care
Holloway and Quill
JAMA 2007;298:802-804.
FULL TEXT  

The Tension between Needing to Improve Care and Knowing How to Do It
Auerbach et al.
NEJM 2007;357:608-613.
FULL TEXT  

Patient safety in obstetrics and gynecology: the call to arms.
Grobman
Obstet Gynecol 2006;108:1058-1059.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2006 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.