You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 297 No. 15, April 18, 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Commentary
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (4)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Law and Medicine
 •Public Health, Other
 •Emergency Medicine
 •Alert me on articles by topic

The Pandemic and All-Hazards Preparedness Act

Improving Public Health Emergency Response

James G. Hodge, Jr, JD, LLM; Lawrence O. Gostin, JD; Jon S. Vernick, JD, MPH

JAMA. 2007;297:1708-1711.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

Public health emergency preparedness and response have been defining goals in the United States since the terrorist and anthrax attacks in the fall of 2001. The objective of emergency preparedness is to improve the nation's ability to detect and respond to an array of public health emergencies including bioterrorism, emerging infectious diseases, and natural disasters. Despite progress toward this goal, the public is skeptical about the government's capabilities, fueled by the perceived lack of leadership and accountability following Hurricane Katrina.1 On December 19, 2006, President George W. Bush signed the Pandemic and All-Hazards Preparedness Act (PAHPA), which is intended to improve the organization, direction, and utility of preparedness efforts.2 PAHPA centralizes federal responsibilities, requires state-based accountability, proposes new national surveillance methods, addresses surge capacity, and facilitates the development of vaccines and other scarce resources.2 This . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Federalism: Balancing Interjurisdictional Responsibilities

Author Affiliations: Center for Law & the Public's Health at Georgetown and Johns Hopkins Universities, Washington, DC, and Baltimore, Md (Messrs Hodge, Gostin, and Vernick); and O’Neill Institute for National and Global Health Law, Washington, DC (Mr Gostin).



THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Mapping the Scope and Opportunities for Public Health Law in Liberal Democracies
Magnusson
J Law Med Ethics 2007;35:571-587.
 





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2007 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.