 |
 |

Genetic Association Studies and False Discoveries
 |
 |
| Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings. |
|
 |
 |
To the Editor: Genetic association studies of common traits are frequently limited by failures of replication and insufficient correction for multiple testing.1-2 Dr Smith and colleagues3 evaluated the association of 24 candidate genes with the risk of venous thrombosis. I have a number of concerns about the use in this study of the false discovery rate (FDR) q value, an emerging statistic that may assist in evaluation of the validity of genetic association findings.4-5
First, the q value was applied to all tests of significance (as in Table 2 of the article). The FDR applies only to positive findingsie, "discoveries."4-5 If a hypothesis test fails to find an association, the FDR is meaningless, because those results are either false negative or are not truly associated with the study end point. With = .05, results for only 3 of the 25 tests in Table 2 merit calculation of the FDR.
Second, no . . . [Full Text of this Article]
Benjamin D. Horne, PhD, MPH
benjamin.horne@intermountainmail.org Cardiovascular Department LDS Hospital, Intermountain Medical Center Salt Lake City, Utah
RELATED LETTER
Genetic Association Studies and False DiscoveriesReply
Nicholas L. Smith, Lucia A. Hindorff, Susan R. Heckbert, Kenneth Rice, Thomas Lumley, Frits R. Rosendaal, and Bruce M. Psaty
JAMA. 2007;297(22):2478.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
RELATED ARTICLE
Association of Genetic Variations With Nonfatal Venous Thrombosis in Postmenopausal Women
Nicholas L. Smith, Lucia A. Hindorff, Susan R. Heckbert, Rozenn N. Lemaitre, Kristin D. Marciante, Kenneth Rice, Thomas Lumley, Joshua C. Bis, Kerri L. Wiggins, Frits R. Rosendaal, and Bruce M. Psaty
JAMA. 2007;297(5):489-498.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
|