 |
|
Clinical Assessment of Hearing Impairment—Reply
|
|
| Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings. |
|
|
|
In Reply: We agree with Drs Kieran and Fenton that sudden unilateral sensorineural hearing loss prompts urgent investigations and may involve immediate commencement of oral steroids. However, we do not agree that the tuning fork tests aid the primary care physician with the diagnosis of this condition or the urgency of referral to an otolaryngologist.
The Weber tuning fork test, which could potentially detect asymmetrical hearing loss, has been evaluated in only 1 study,1 which showed that it is inaccurate and lacks precision. The positive likelihood ratio (LR) is 1.6 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.0-2.3) and the negative LR is 0.7 (95% CI, 0.48-1.0), so that regardless of the finding, the probability of unilateral hearing loss is neither increased nor decreased, making it the "Homan sign" of hearing tests. The Rinne tuning fork test, which potentially detects only conductive hearing loss, has a large range of reported accuracies. Negative LRs . . . [Full Text of this Article]
Akshay Bagai, MD;
Paaladinesh Thavendiranathan, MD;
Allan S. Detsky, MD, PhD
allan.detsky@uhn.on.ca
Mount Sinai Hospital
Toronto, Ontario
RELATED LETTERS
Clinical Assessment of Hearing Impairment
Stephen M. Kieran and John E. Fenton
JAMA. 2007;297(7):695.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Clinical Assessment of Hearing Impairment
David L. Gaspar
JAMA. 2007;297(7):695.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
RELATED ARTICLE
Does This Patient Have Hearing Impairment?
Akshay Bagai, Paaladinesh Thavendiranathan, and Allan S. Detsky
JAMA. 2006;295(4):416-428.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
|
