 |
|
Thank You to JAMA Peer Reviewers and Authors
Phil B. Fontanarosa, MD, MBA;
Catherine D. DeAngelis, MD, MPH
JAMA. 2007;297:875.
|
|
| Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings. |
|
|
|
Biomedical journals have an important role in shaping medical science and the practice of medicine. Knowing that information in JAMA is used by physicians and other health care professionals to make decisions about the patients they care for makes the responsibility of editing this journal a humbling experience and, perhaps more importantly, serves as a constant reminder of the major responsibility of ensuring that articles published in JAMA are as clinically relevant, scientifically valid, ethically sound, and accurately reported as possible. Fulfilling this duty and responsibility is made possible because of the active contributions and dedicated involvement of 2 critically important journal constituencies—peer reviewers and authors—to whom we extend our utmost appreciation.
In this issue of JAMA, we are publishing the names of the 3490 peer reviewers who completed manuscript reviews for JAMA in 2006. These reviewers represent nearly . . . [Full Text of this Article]
Author Affiliations: Dr Fontanarosa (phil.fontanarosa@jama-archives.org) is Executive Deputy Editor and Dr DeAngelis is Editor-in-Chief, JAMA.
RELATED ARTICLE
JAMA Peer Reviewers in 2006
JAMA. 2007;297(8):880-892.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
|
