This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Citing articles on ISI (1)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in JAMA  Topic Collections  • Injury Prevention & Control  • Violence and Human Rights, Other  • Psychiatry  • Alert me on articles by topic

Lynne Lamberg

JAMA. 2007;298:499-501.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

San Diego—Dangerous or not? Until recently, assessment of whether a person with severe mental illness was likely to commit acts of violence relied solely on clinical impressions and experience.

Structured violence risk assessment tools, developed in the past 15 years, may help clinicians increase the accuracy of their judgment by quantifying the probability of violence, according to talks at the annual meeting of the American Psychiatric Association (APA) here in May.

These tools, which range from paper-and-pencil questionnaires to software programs, compare an individual's characteristics to known predictors of violence. Scores show where that individual falls on a continuum of risk for committing future violence, said Paul Appelbaum, MD, who directs the division of psychiatry, law, and ethics at the Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY.

Software programs and other structured violence risk assessment tools may help clinicians quantify the probability of violence . . . [Full Text of this Article]

PREDICTING VIOLENCE

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Preventing the Unpredicted: Managing Violence Risk in Mental Health Care
Swanson
Psychiatr. Serv. 2008;59:191-193.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT