You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 298 No. 9, September 5, 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Editorial
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (4)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Quality of Care, Other
 •Medical Education
 •Prognosis/ Outcomes
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Teaching Quality Improvement

The Devil Is in the Details

Paul Batalden, MD; Frank Davidoff, MD

JAMA. 2007;298:1059-1061.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

From the list of 14 characteristics he assembled in 1980, Cyril Houle, a serious student of professional education, singled out self-development as professionalism's one unchanging feature; as he put it, "[A]s an occupational group raises its level of performance . . . its right to call itself a profession increases."1 Houle's choice of words warrants serious attention: a profession is defined by what it does, not just what it knows, and by doing what it does better all the time, not just doing it well.

Medicine's enormous and highly specialized body of knowledge inarguably makes it a learned profession, but delivering care is performance, not scholarship. In its most basic form, the delivery of science-based care consists of applying generalizable scientific knowledge to the problems of particular patients who are ill, with the result that those patients are better off. Learning to deliver care therefore means going beyond . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Author Affiliations: Center for Evaluative Clinical Sciences, Dartmouth Medical School, Lebanon, New Hampshire (Dr Batalden); and Institute for Healthcare Improvement, Cambridge, Massachusetts (Dr Davidoff).


RELATED ARTICLE

Effectiveness of Teaching Quality Improvement to Clinicians: A Systematic Review
Romsai T. Boonyasai, Donna M. Windish, Chayan Chakraborti, Leonard S. Feldman, Haya R. Rubin, and Eric B. Bass
JAMA. 2007;298(9):1023-1037.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Doctors, managers and the battle for quality
Marshall
JRSM 2008;101:330-331.
FULL TEXT  

Assessing Competencies of Knowledge and Process Improvement
Dewar
JAMA 2008;299:2276-2276.
FULL TEXT  

A proposal: publication guidelines for healthcare improvement education reports
Stevens and Andersson-Gare
Qual Saf Health Care 2007;16:402-402.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2007 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.