This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in JAMA  Topic Collections  • Quality of Care, Other  • Diagnosis  • Aging/ Geriatrics  • Alert me on articles by topic

Bruce Leff, MD; Thomas E. Finucane, MD

JAMA. 2008;299(15):1830-1832.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

It seems that "gizmo idolatry" now exists in the practice of medicine. "Gizmo" is defined by the American Heritage Dictionary as "a mechanical device or part whose name is forgotten or unknown; a gadget." In this article, gizmo is used to refer to a mechanical device or procedure for which the clinical benefit in a specific clinical context is not clearly established, and gizmo idolatry refers to the general implicit conviction that a more technological approach is intrinsically better than one that is less technological unless, or perhaps even if, there is strong evidence to the contrary. The credulous acceptance and rapid diffusion of frontal lobotomies in the 1930s and 1940s led to great harm, and to a Nobel Prize for Egas Moniz in 1949 "for his discovery of the therapeutic value of leucotomy in certain psychoses."¹ Autologous bone marrow transplantation for breast . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Common Sense Appeal

Author Affiliations: Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine (Drs Leff and Finucane), and Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health (Dr Leff), Johns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center, Baltimore, Maryland.

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

All you need to read in the other general journals
BMJ 2008;336:914-915.
FULL TEXT