You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 299 No. 16, April 23/30, 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Letters
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related articles
 •Related letters
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Quality of Care, Other
 •Diagnosis
 •Cardiovascular Disease/ Myocardial Infarction
 •Cardiac Diagnostic Tests
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Misinterpretation of Electrocardiograms and Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory Activations

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

To the Editor: In a prospective registry study of a regional ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) treatment program, Dr Larson and colleagues1 found that the "false-positive" rate of cardiac catheterization laboratory activation ranged from 9% to 11%, depending on the definition used. As pointed out by Dr Masoudi2 in the accompanying Editorial, some degree of false-positive laboratory activation may be inevitable. In particular, current guidelines recommend an immediate invasive strategy over fibrinolytic therapy when the diagnosis of STEMI is uncertain,3 especially among patients at high risk of bleeding and intracranial hemorrhage. Furthermore, ancillary diagnostic tests such as echocardiography may have limited utility in differentiating between previous and acute myocardial infarction. Thus, to a certain extent, false-positive activation of cardiac catheterization laboratory may be entirely appropriate. This concept may be akin to the use of exploratory laparotomy for suspected appendicitis, where some false-positive results are generally accepted given the potentially dire consequences . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Andrew T. Yan, MD
yana@smh.toronto.on.ca

Raymond T. Yan, MD; Shaun G. Goodman, MD, MSc
St Michael's Hospital
University of Toronto
Toronto, Canada


RELATED ARTICLES

"False-Positive" Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory Activation Among Patients With Suspected ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction
David M. Larson, Katie M. Menssen, Scott W. Sharkey, Sue Duval, Robert S. Schwartz, James Harris, Jeffrey T. Meland, Barbara T. Unger, and Timothy D. Henry
JAMA. 2007;298(23):2754-2760.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Measuring the Quality of Primary PCI for ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Time for Balance
Frederick A. Masoudi
JAMA. 2007;298(23):2790-2791.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

RELATED LETTERS

Misinterpretation of Electrocardiograms and Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory Activations—Reply
David M. Larson, Scott W. Sharkey, and Timothy D. Henry
JAMA. 2008;299(16):1897-1898.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Misinterpretation of Electrocardiograms and Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory Activations—Reply
Frederick A. Masoudi
JAMA. 2008;299(16):1898.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2008 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.