This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Related article  • Related letters  • Similar articles in JAMA  Topic Collections  • Quality of Care, Other  • Diagnosis  • Cardiovascular Disease/ Myocardial Infarction  • Cardiac Diagnostic Tests  • Alert me on articles by topic

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

In Reply: We agree with Dr Yan and colleagues that false-positive activation of the cardiac catheterization laboratory may be entirely appropriate. We also agree that accurate interpretation of the ECG is a critical issue and that ongoing quality improvement efforts should be in place to avoid unnecessary catheterization laboratory activation.

Yan et al point out that the prevalence of clearly inappropriate referrals for primary percutaneous coronary intervention was lower than in previous studies. This is likely to be related to the extensive initial training at each referral site as well as a quality improvement program that provides immediate feedback to the emergency physician for each individual case, allowing angiographic correlation with the clinical and ECG findings. In addition, the false-positive cardiac catheterization activation range of 9% to 14% is based primarily on the emergency department physician diagnosis. Depending on the algorithm used, prehospital diagnosis and triage may be associated with . . . [Full Text of this Article]

David M. Larson, MD; Scott W. Sharkey, MD; Timothy D. Henry, MD
henry003@umn.edu
Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation at Abbott Northwestern Hospital
Minneapolis, Minnesota

RELATED ARTICLE

Prognostic Value of a Normal or Nonspecific Initial Electrocardiogram in Acute Myocardial Infarction
Robert D. Welch, Robert J. Zalenski, Paul D. Frederick, Judith A. Malmgren, Scott Compton, Mary Grzybowski, Sophia Thomas, Terry Kowalenko, Nathan R. Every, and for the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction 2 and 3 Investigators
JAMA. 2001;286(16):1977-1984.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

RELATED LETTERS

Misinterpretation of Electrocardiograms and Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory Activations
Andrew T. Yan, Raymond T. Yan, and Shaun G. Goodman
JAMA. 2008;299(16):1897.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Misinterpretation of Electrocardiograms and Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory Activations—Reply
Frederick A. Masoudi
JAMA. 2008;299(16):1898.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT