You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 300 No. 1, July 2, 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Letters
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Related letter
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Statistics and Research Methods
 •Prognosis/ Outcomes
 •Critical Care/ Intensive Care Medicine
 •Adult Critical Care
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Randomized Controlled Trials in Critical Care Medicine—Reply

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

In Reply: We appreciate the high esteem in which Dr Zijlstra and colleagues place RCTs and join them in wishing that more trials would be undisputedly positive. They suggest changing, and possibly lowering, the standards of evidence on which intensivists should base care because the interventions tested in RCTs generally target only 1 of many problems; thus, outcomes such as mortality are hard to modify and, by extension, the trials will always have a high likelihood of failure.

Although we do not believe that RCTs should be abandoned, we do agree that RCTs should continue to test interventions better designed to influence important clinical outcomes. The 2 particular trials we discussed,1-2 although attempting to manipulate a rather narrow spectrum of the wide set of physiologic derangements seen in critically ill patients, were both notable in that they demonstrated the feasibility of disseminating and testing quite complex interventions. Thus, these trials . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Jean-Daniel Chiche, MD
jean-daniel.chiche@cch.aphp.fr
Department of Critical Care Medicine
AP-HP, Hopital Cochin
University René Descartes
Paris, France

Derek C. Angus, MD, MPH
CRISMA Laboratory
Department of Critical Care Medicine
School of Medicine
University of Pittsburgh
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania


RELATED ARTICLE

Ventilation Strategy Using Low Tidal Volumes, Recruitment Maneuvers, and High Positive End-Expiratory Pressure for Acute Lung Injury and Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Maureen O. Meade, Deborah J. Cook, Gordon H. Guyatt, Arthur S. Slutsky, Yaseen M. Arabi, D. James Cooper, Andrew R. Davies, Lori E. Hand, Qi Zhou, Lehana Thabane, Peggy Austin, Stephen Lapinsky, Alan Baxter, James Russell, Yoanna Skrobik, Juan J. Ronco, Thomas E. Stewart, and for the Lung Open Ventilation Study Investigators
JAMA. 2008;299(6):637-645.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

RELATED LETTER

Randomized Controlled Trials in Critical Care Medicine
J. G. Zijlstra, J. J. M. Ligtenberg, and A. R. J. Girbes
JAMA. 2008;300(1):43.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2008 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.