You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 301 No. 10, March 11, 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Book and Media Reviews
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Psychiatry
 •Post Traumatic Stress Disorder
 •Violence and Human Rights
 •Violence and Human Rights, Other
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?


Understanding Trauma: Integrating Biological, Clinical, and Cultural Perspectives

Edited by Laurence J. Kirmayer, Robert Lemelson, and Mark Barad
519 pp, $34.99
New York, NY, Cambridge University Press, 2008
ISBN-13: 978-0-5217-2699-3

JAMA. 2009;301(10):1070-1071.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

This book has something to offer almost anyone interested in the effects of psychological trauma on individuals and communities. It is crafted to integrate knowledge of trauma responses across the disciplines of neurobiology, clinical science, and anthropology and is organized by sections primarily associated with each discipline. The conceptualization of the book emerged from a series of workshops organized and funded by the Foundation for Psychosocial Research in 2001 and 2002. The editors acknowledge that "In modest ways this integration occurred" (p 475) and that "Each discipline used markedly different styles of reasoning, rhetoric, and presentation" (pp 476-477). The greatest degree of integration occurred between the neuroscientists and the clinicians. During the conference discussions—and as is evident in the style of the chapters—"the anthropologists seemed nonplussed at the inevitability of bullet points, graphs, and tables in the neuroscience presentations, whereas the neuroscientists were frustrated by the uncharted narratives that unfolded . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Thomas A. Grieger, MD (Captain [retired], US Navy), Reviewer
Department of Psychiatry
Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences
Bethesda, Maryland
thomas.grieger@gmail.com



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2009 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.