You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 302 No. 14, October 14, 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Letters
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related articles
 •Related letters
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Oncology
 •Colon Cancer
 •Patient-Physician Relationship/ Care
 •Treatment Adherence
 •Radiologic Imaging
 •Surgery
 •Surgical Interventions
 •Colorectal Surgery
 •Diagnosis
 •Computed Tomography
 •Drug Therapy
 •Adherence
 •Gastroenterology
 •Gastrointestinal Diseases
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Computed Tomographic Colonography for Detecting Advanced Neoplasia

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

To the Editor: Dr Regge and colleagues1 stated that because CT colonography is less invasive and thus more tolerable, it may increase adherence to colorectal cancer screening. However, this may not be true.

Assume that one 10-year cycle would require 2 CT colonography screenings vs 1 optical colonoscopy, 20% of CT colonography-screened patients need an optical colonoscopy after CT colonography for each 5-year cycle, and 1 half-day of work would be lost for CT colonography and 1 day lost for optical colonoscopy. In that case, total time off work would be 1.4 days for those screened with CT colonography vs 1 day with colonoscopy; those screened by CT colonography would experience 2.4 colon cleansing procedures vs 1 for optical colonoscopy. It seems unlikely that patients would adhere better to CT colonography screening. Prospective studies are required to answer this question.

In her Editorial, Dr Finlayson2 suggested that CT colonography lesions . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Paul Pisarik, MD, MPH
paul-pisarik@ouhsc.edu
Department of Family Medicine
University of Oklahoma School of Community Medicine
Tulsa



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLES

Diagnostic Accuracy of Computed Tomographic Colonography for the Detection of Advanced Neoplasia in Individuals at Increased Risk of Colorectal Cancer
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , and
JAMA. ;301():2453-2461.
FULL TEXT  

Computed Tomographic Colonography for Patients at High Risk of Colorectal Cancer: Trading Accuracy for Access and Compliance

JAMA. ;301():2498-2499.
FULL TEXT  

RELATED LETTERS

Computed Tomographic Colonography for Detecting Advanced Neoplasia

JAMA. ;302():1527-1527.
FULL TEXT  

Computed Tomographic Colonography for Detecting Advanced Neoplasia--Reply
, , and
JAMA. ;302():1528-1528.
FULL TEXT  

Computed Tomographic Colonography for Detecting Advanced Neoplasia--Reply

JAMA. ;302():1528-1529.
FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2009 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.