You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 302 No. 14, October 14, 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Letters
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Related letters
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Oncology
 •Colon Cancer
 •Patient-Physician Relationship/ Care
 •Treatment Adherence
 •Radiologic Imaging
 •Surgery
 •Surgical Interventions
 •Colorectal Surgery
 •Diagnosis
 •Computed Tomography
 •Drug Therapy
 •Adherence
 •Gastroenterology
 •Gastrointestinal Diseases
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Computed Tomographic Colonography for Detecting Advanced Neoplasia—Reply

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

In Reply: We agree with Dr Matuchansky that flat lesions are important to consider regarding colorectal cancer development and prevention, particularly in persons with a positive family history. In our study, we excluded patients with the highest family risk of cancer: those with criteria for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer syndrome, who have the highest likelihood of developing aggressive flat lesions. Our article did not consider the diagnostic value for flat lesions, but these data are under analysis. Preliminary results1 for 738 individuals with polyps found 39 flat lesions (5.3%) according to the definition used by Matuchansky; this prevalence is consistent with what would be expected having excluded individuals with the highest risk of flat lesions. The study by Soetikno et al2 found a 9.4% average prevalence of flat/depressed lesions in a mixed population, ranging from 5.8% to 15.4% depending on the risk category. Sensitivity of CT colonography for flat lesions . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Giovanni Galatola, MD; Cristiana Laudi, MD
cristiana.laudi@ircc.it
Gastroenterology Unit

Daniele Regge, MD
Radiology Unit
Institute for Cancer Research and Treatment
Candiolo, Turin, Italy



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

Prevalence of Nonpolypoid (Flat and Depressed) Colorectal Neoplasms in Asymptomatic and Symptomatic Adults
Roy M. Soetikno, Tonya Kaltenbach, Robert V. Rouse, Walter Park, Anamika Maheshwari, Tohru Sato, Suzanne Matsui, and Shai Friedland
JAMA. 2008;299(9):1027-1035.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

RELATED LETTERS

Computed Tomographic Colonography for Detecting Advanced Neoplasia
Claude Matuchansky
JAMA. 2009;302(14):1527.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Computed Tomographic Colonography for Detecting Advanced Neoplasia
Paul Pisarik
JAMA. 2009;302(14):1527-1528.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Computed Tomographic Colonography for Detecting Advanced Neoplasia—Reply
Emily Finlayson
JAMA. 2009;302(14):1528-1529.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2009 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.