You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 302 No. 14, October 14, 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Letters
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Related letters
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Oncology
 •Colon Cancer
 •Patient-Physician Relationship/ Care
 •Treatment Adherence
 •Radiologic Imaging
 •Surgery
 •Surgical Interventions
 •Colorectal Surgery
 •Diagnosis
 •Computed Tomography
 •Drug Therapy
 •Adherence
 •Gastroenterology
 •Gastrointestinal Diseases
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Computed Tomographic Colonography for Detecting Advanced Neoplasia—Reply

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

In Reply: Dr Pisarik questions the acceptance of CT colonography by patients and the accuracy of polyp size determination by CT colonography. He doubts the assumption in the study by Regge et al1 that CT colonography will be better tolerated by patients and thus improve adherence to screening and surveillance programs. Pisarik argues that the 1.4 days off work and the 2 colon cleansings for 2 CT colonographies over a 10-year period is more of an onus to patients than 1 day off work and 1 colon cleansing for optical colonoscopy. I believe that these differences are quite small and unlikely to have a major effect on patient preferences. Moreover, if future studies continue to report high rates of sensitivity and specificity for CT colonography, the currently recommended screening interval of 5 years may be prolonged. In the meantime, patient preference for colorectal cancer screening in the era of CT . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Emily Finlayson, MD, MS
efinlays@umich.edu
Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery
University of Michigan Health Systems
Ann Arbor



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

Diagnostic Accuracy of Computed Tomographic Colonography for the Detection of Advanced Neoplasia in Individuals at Increased Risk of Colorectal Cancer
Daniele Regge, Cristiana Laudi, Giovanni Galatola, Patrizia Della Monica, Luigina Bonelli, Giuseppe Angelelli, Roberto Asnaghi, Brunella Barbaro, Carlo Bartolozzi, Didier Bielen, Luca Boni, Claudia Borghi, Paolo Bruzzi, Maria Carla Cassinis, Massimo Galia, Teresa Maria Gallo, Andrea Grasso, Cesare Hassan, Andrea Laghi, Maria Cristina Martina, Emanuele Neri, Carlo Senore, Giovanni Simonetti, Silvia Venturini, and Giovanni Gandini
JAMA. 2009;301(23):2453-2461.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

RELATED LETTERS

Computed Tomographic Colonography for Detecting Advanced Neoplasia
Claude Matuchansky
JAMA. 2009;302(14):1527.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Computed Tomographic Colonography for Detecting Advanced Neoplasia
Paul Pisarik
JAMA. 2009;302(14):1527-1528.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Computed Tomographic Colonography for Detecting Advanced Neoplasia—Reply
Giovanni Galatola, Cristiana Laudi, and Daniele Regge
JAMA. 2009;302(14):1528.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2009 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.