 |
 |

Lipoprotein(a) Measurement and Determining Risk of Myocardial Infarction
 |
 |
| Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings. |
|
 |
 |
To the Editor: Dr Kamstrup and colleagues1 assessed the association between elevated lipoprotein(a) and risk of myocardial infarction using data from the Copenhagen General Population Study (CGPS), the Copenhagen City Heart Study, and the Copenhagen Ischemic Heart Disease Study. We believe that several limitations were not adequately addressed in their article.
Measurement of lipoprotein(a) levels in the CGPS began before the IFCC/WHO consensus on lipoprotein(a) and the SRM-2B reference reagent study2 leading to adoption of lipoprotein(a) measurement as a molar particle concentration (lipoprotein[a]-P), independent of apolipoprotein(a) kringle IV type 2 repeat isoform. The values of lipoprotein(a) in the CGPS are based on an assay determining lipoprotein(a) mass and are subject to bias by apolipoprotein(a) molecular weight. Comparison with current isoform-independent molar assays confirms substantial bias with the older methods.2 The generalizability of the CGPS lipoprotein(a) serum level and lipoprotein(a) population percentile data to current lipoprotein(a) molar serum assays may be . . . [Full Text of this Article]
Steven R. Jones, MD
sjones64@jhmi.edu
Roger S. Blumenthal, MD
Division of Cardiology Johns Hopkins Hospital Baltimore, Maryland
CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter
What's this?
RELATED ARTICLE
Genetically Elevated Lipoprotein(a) and Increased Risk of Myocardial Infarction
Pia R. Kamstrup, Anne Tybjærg-Hansen, Rolf Steffensen, and Børge G. Nordestgaard
JAMA. 2009;301(22):2331-2339.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
RELATED LETTER
Lipoprotein(a) Measurement and Determining Risk of Myocardial Infarction—Reply
Pia R. Kamstrup and Børge G. Nordestgaard
JAMA. 2009;302(15):1645-1646.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
|