You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 302 No. 16, October 28, 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Commentary
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Medical Practice
 •Medical Education
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Reform of Continuing Medical Education

Investments in Physician Human Capital

Eric G. Campbell, PhD; Meredith Rosenthal, PhD

JAMA. 2009;302(16):1807-1808.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

In 1910, Flexner published a scathing indictment of undergraduate medical education at the time.1 The Flexner report demanded reform of medical education, arguing that it should consist of rigorous preclinical education and supervised clinical training in hospitals and be isolated from commercialism. The report established the current system of undergraduate medical education.1

A century later, another component of the continuum of medical education requires equally sweeping reform—continuing medical education (CME). Continuing medical education exhibits failures that parallel those defined in the Flexner report. If CME became a productive means of investing in physician human capital and if physicians could appropriate the returns to that capital, the profession would demand CME of an entirely different character. Furthermore, CME should apply new knowledge and skills that directly benefit patient and societal outcomes (ie, providing high-quality, efficient, and cost-effective care)—domains that have not been the traditional . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Critique of Current CME

Excessive Commercialization

Unstandardized Curricula

Lack of Effect on Patient Care

Author Affiliations: Institute for Health Policy, Massachusetts General Hospital (Dr Campbell), and Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard School of Public Health (Dr Rosenthal), Boston.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2009 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.