You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 302 No. 17, November 4, 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Letters
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Related letters
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Occupational and Environmental Medicine
 •Psychiatry
 •Depression
 •Statistics and Research Methods
 •Genetics
 •Genetic Disorders
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Gene-Environment Interactions and Depression

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

To the Editor: In their meta-analysis, Dr Risch and colleagues1 concluded that the study of gene-environment interaction in mental disorders should await the identification of "robust marginal gene associations." We believe that this conclusion extends well beyond the data, and an alternate explanation of their findings suggests other courses of action. The absence of replicable findings across studies that assessed both direct genotype-depression associations and gene-environment interactions may be explained by mismeasurement and undermeasurement of relevant environmental contexts.

Two compelling strands of evidence support this hypothesis. First, there is a sharp contrast in the consistency of success in studies that have sought genotype-phenotype associations in animals and in humans. For example, animal models of depression and anxiety disorders have consistently demonstrated genotype-phenotype associations.2 By contrast, a recent genome-wide association study (GWAS) of depression found no significant associations.3 One central difference between these 2 research approaches lies in control over potentially . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Karestan C. Koenen, PhD
kkoenen@hsph.harvard.edu
Department of Society, Human Development, and Health
Harvard School of Public Health
Boston, Massachusetts

Sandro Galea, MD, DrPH
Department of Epidemiology
School of Public Health
University of Michigan
Ann Arbor



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

Interaction Between the Serotonin Transporter Gene (5-HTTLPR), Stressful Life Events, and Risk of Depression: A Meta-analysis
Neil Risch, Richard Herrell, Thomas Lehner, Kung-Yee Liang, Lindon Eaves, Josephine Hoh, Andrea Griem, Maria Kovacs, Jurg Ott, and Kathleen Ries Merikangas
JAMA. 2009;301(23):2462-2471.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

RELATED LETTERS

Gene-Environment Interactions and Depression
Francis E. Lotrich and Eric Lenze
JAMA. 2009;302(17):1859-1862.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Gene-Environment Interactions and Depression
Christian Schwahn and Hans Jörgen Grabe
JAMA. 2009;302(17):1859-1862.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Gene-Environment Interactions and Depression
Nina Rieckmann, Michael A. Rapp, and Jacqueline Müller-Nordhorn
JAMA. 2009;302(17):1859-1862.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Gene-Environment Interactions and Depression—Reply
Kathleen Ries Merikangas, Thomas Lehner, and Neil J. Risch
JAMA. 2009;302(17):1859-1862.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2009 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.