You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 302 No. 7, August 19, 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Letters
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Related letters
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Medical Practice
 •Conflict of Interest
 •Medical Education
 •Dermatology
 •Dermatology, Other
 •Drug Therapy
 •Drug Therapy, Other
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Industry Support and Professional Medical Associations

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

To the Editor: In their Special Communication, Dr Rothman and colleagues1 noted that "extensive literature has documented the influence of gifts on individual physicians." To my knowledge, there is no similar evidence showing that commercial support of continuing medical education (CME) has the same influence, either on physicians or on their professional medical associations (PMAs).

The best current evidence is a study commissioned by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME) and not published in the peer-reviewed literature.2 Additional high-quality evidence in this area would add to this already valuable national discussion.

It is critical to recognize the implications of the difference between relationships of individual physicians with industry and grants from industry to PMAs for independent CME. Based on the evidence, few of the authors' recommendations follow convincingly. One which does, however, is that committees crafting clinical practice guidelines should be composed of members without ties to industry, . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Norman Kahn, MD
nkahn@cmss.org
Council of Medical Specialty Societies
Chicago, Illinois



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

Professional Medical Associations and Their Relationships With Industry: A Proposal for Controlling Conflict of Interest
David J. Rothman, Walter J. McDonald, Carol D. Berkowitz, Susan C. Chimonas, Catherine D. DeAngelis, Ralph W. Hale, Steven E. Nissen, June E. Osborn, James H. Scully, Jr, Gerald E. Thomson, and David Wofsy
JAMA. 2009;301(13):1367-1372.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

RELATED LETTERS

Industry Support and Professional Medical Associations
Peter C. Lombardo
JAMA. 2009;302(7):737-738.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Industry Support and Professional Medical Associations
Walker L. Ray and Robert L. Addleton
JAMA. 2009;302(7):738.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Industry Support and Professional Medical Associations
Robert H. Jackson
JAMA. 2009;302(7):738.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Industry Support and Professional Medical Associations
C. Daniel Smith, Jo Buyske, and Mark A. Talamini
JAMA. 2009;302(7):738-739.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Industry Support and Professional Medical Associations—Reply
David J. Rothman and Walter J. McDonald
JAMA. 2009;302(7):739.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2009 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.