You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 302 No. 7, August 19, 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Letters
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Related letters
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Medical Practice
 •Conflict of Interest
 •Medical Education
 •Dermatology
 •Dermatology, Other
 •Drug Therapy
 •Drug Therapy, Other
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Industry Support and Professional Medical Associations

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

To the Editor: In their Special Communication, Dr Rothman and colleagues1 made a number of suggestions to control the real and perceived conflicts of interest encountered in PMAs. Regarding industry support of conferences and other educational meetings, they recommended that "each PMA might establish a CME committee whose members, free of all industry ties, would have the responsibility to distribute unrestricted, educational grants from industry."

Such a model already exists and has been active for more than 2 years. The collaborative grants model developed by the Physicians' Institute for Excellence in Medicine (PIEM, a subsidiary of the Medical Association of Georgia) does just that.2 Grants are solicited from industry; in turn, these are distributed through a request-for-proposal process to 14 state medical societies. A committee of physicians in each society decides which of the applications from their state should be sent forward to PIEM for a final decision. Industry plays . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Walker L. Ray, MD; Robert L. Addleton, EdD
bob@physiciansinstitute.org
Physicians' Institute for Excellence in Medicine
Medical Association of Georgia
Atlanta



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

Professional Medical Associations and Their Relationships With Industry: A Proposal for Controlling Conflict of Interest
David J. Rothman, Walter J. McDonald, Carol D. Berkowitz, Susan C. Chimonas, Catherine D. DeAngelis, Ralph W. Hale, Steven E. Nissen, June E. Osborn, James H. Scully, Jr, Gerald E. Thomson, and David Wofsy
JAMA. 2009;301(13):1367-1372.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

RELATED LETTERS

Industry Support and Professional Medical Associations
Norman Kahn
JAMA. 2009;302(7):737.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Industry Support and Professional Medical Associations
Peter C. Lombardo
JAMA. 2009;302(7):737-738.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Industry Support and Professional Medical Associations
Robert H. Jackson
JAMA. 2009;302(7):738.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Industry Support and Professional Medical Associations
C. Daniel Smith, Jo Buyske, and Mark A. Talamini
JAMA. 2009;302(7):738-739.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Industry Support and Professional Medical Associations—Reply
David J. Rothman and Walter J. McDonald
JAMA. 2009;302(7):739.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

A Time to Raise Our Voice(s)
Park and Swanstrom
SURG INNOV 2009;16:205-206.
 





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2009 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.