You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 302 No. 7, August 19, 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Letters
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Related letters
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Medical Practice
 •Conflict of Interest
 •Medical Education
 •Dermatology
 •Dermatology, Other
 •Drug Therapy
 •Drug Therapy, Other
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Industry Support and Professional Medical Associations—Reply

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

In Reply: Although Dr Kahn is correct in noting the absence of definitive studies demonstrating bias in commercially supported CME, the absence of such studies does not mean an absence of bias. Our recommendation reflected the now accepted finding that gifts and payments, even when small, influence physicians' beliefs and behaviors.1 Accordingly, they are likely to influence the individuals and committees who select CME topics and the speakers who deliver them. The report of the November 2007 Macy Foundation conference noted that of the total $2.4 billion income for accredited CME activities in 2006, drug and device company support accounted for $1.5 billion, or more than 60 percent.2 Similar to the conference participants, we do not believe that such levels of industry support would have been forthcoming if the companies were not convinced that their funds were enhancing "shareholder value by promoting the sale of their products."2 Finally, it is . . . [Full Text of this Article]

David J. Rothman, PhD
djr5@columbia.edu
Center on Medicine as a Profession
Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons
New York, New York

Walter J. McDonald, MD
Battle Ground, Washington



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

Professional Medical Associations and Their Relationships With Industry: A Proposal for Controlling Conflict of Interest
David J. Rothman, Walter J. McDonald, Carol D. Berkowitz, Susan C. Chimonas, Catherine D. DeAngelis, Ralph W. Hale, Steven E. Nissen, June E. Osborn, James H. Scully, Jr, Gerald E. Thomson, and David Wofsy
JAMA. 2009;301(13):1367-1372.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

RELATED LETTERS

Industry Support and Professional Medical Associations
Norman Kahn
JAMA. 2009;302(7):737.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Industry Support and Professional Medical Associations
Peter C. Lombardo
JAMA. 2009;302(7):737-738.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Industry Support and Professional Medical Associations
Walker L. Ray and Robert L. Addleton
JAMA. 2009;302(7):738.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Industry Support and Professional Medical Associations
Robert H. Jackson
JAMA. 2009;302(7):738.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Industry Support and Professional Medical Associations
C. Daniel Smith, Jo Buyske, and Mark A. Talamini
JAMA. 2009;302(7):738-739.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2009 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.