This Article  • PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in JAMA  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

JAMA. 1998;279:1782.

In the February 18 Resident Forum column, we reported on the issue of collective negotiations between resident physicians and their residency programs. The question being considered by the National Labor Relations Board is whether residents would be protected under US labor laws if they negotiated working conditions with their programs. Absent a voice in these negotiations, some residents feel that they have little opportunity to improve their working conditions and little recourse when faced with mistreatment. Some of the criticism for the status quo has fallen on the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME), which accredits the 7619 residency programs.

One of the criticisms has been that the ACGME's process for reviewing complaints against residency programs is too slow. Residents have argued that too often the process takes so long that the resident who originally filed the complaint has completed residency before the complaint was fully addressed. To address this specific concern, the ACGME recently enacted a "rapid response mechanism" for some complaints. The full text of this procedure is presented below. The ACGME is also reviewing its institutional requirements to address other concerns; we will report on these in a future Resident Forum.

Prepared by Ashish Bajaj, Department of Resident Physician Services, American Medical Association.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?