You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 254 No. 14, October 11, 1985 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  COUNCIL REPORT
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

The Use of Cardiac Pacemakers in Medical Practice

Excerpts From the Report of the Advisory Panel

Council on Scientific Affairs

JAMA. 1985;254(14):1952-1954.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

IN SEPTEMBER 1982, the Senate Select Committee on Aging reported on a year-long investigation of problems related to the purchase and use of pacemakers under Medicare coverage.1 Questions were raised about device performance, application of warranty provisions, cost of pacemaker therapy, and medical reimbursement policies. Other issues opened to query included alleged overutilization of pacemakers, the increasing proficiency needed by physicians who perform pacemaker implantations, the role of the pacemaker sales representative in dealing with the medical profession, and the essential equipment and skilled personnel required for pacemaker implantation facilities. The Senate committee recommended reestablishment of the pacemaker registry sponsored by the Food and Drug Administration until it was discontinued in 1980. The committee suggested that pacemaker centers be established to treat patients who need more difficult or complex pacemaker instrumentation.

In 1982, the Inspector General of the Department of Health and Human Services reviewed the Veterans Administration's experience . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations

From the Council on Scientific Affairs, Division of Drugs and Technology, American Medical Association, Chicago.


Footnotes

Report C of the Council on Scientific Affairs, adopted by the House of Delegates of the American Medical Association at the Annual Meeting, June 1984.

This report is not intended to be construed or to serve as a standard of medical care. Standards of medical care are determined on the basis of all of the facts and circumstances involved in an individual case and are subject to change as scientific knowledge and technology advance and patterns of practice evolve. This report reflects the views of scientific experts and reports in the scientific literature as of July 1984.

Reprint requests to the Division of Drugs and Technology, Council on Scientific Affairs, American Medical Association, 535 N Dearborn St, Chicago, IL 60610 (John C. Ballin, PhD).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1985 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.